Tuesday 10 April 2012
Are Homophobes Just Repressing Their Homosexual Desires? New Study Says Yes
...and now a few words from Mr Bachmann!
Syrian forces fire on Turkish refugee camp
Let's read Mrs Assad in Vogue again shall we? (..."wildly democratic" family-focused couple who vacation in Europe, foster Christianity, are at ease with American celebrities, made theirs the "safest country in the Middle East," and want to give Syria a "brand essence.")
Via
Well they've got an essence about them that's for sure...
Monday 9 April 2012
John Cooper Clarke - Beasley Boulevard
My friend TimN managed to lose his vid of JCC's performance of this update to 'Beasley Street' from the other night somehow and is in a fowl mood!!!
Gentrification don't you just love it???
The Stoner Arms Dealers: How Two American Kids Became Big-Time Weapons Traders
MORE
Sunday 8 April 2012
How to check for (and remove, if found) the 'Flashback' Trojan Backdoor in Mac OS X
A quick heads-up for Mac users with newer (Intel) Macs: The statistics at Russian security firm Dr Web suggest over half-a-million Macs worldwide are infected with a Trojan Backdoor which joins the machines to a botnet.
Infection rates are said to be highest in the US (56.6%), Canada (19.8%), the UK (12%) and Australia (6%).
There's a script you can download from the Apple Support Communities to automate the process if you don't want to do it manually using Terminal:
Mac OS X: Checking for and removing the "Flashback" trojan
F-Secure has manual removal instructions if you prefer:
Trojan-Downloader:OSX/Flashback.I
...and don't forget to run Software Update :)
[Image via Dr Web]
Stats, drugs and rock'n'roll - another storm in the same old teacup
Both men were quoted in the 26-page report that was released in support of the think tank's call to review drug laws. This review was necessary, the report said, because, ''the harms resulting from prohibition substantially outweigh the gains from efforts by police to suppress the criminal drug industry''. Really? I must have missed that. Because I thought current strategies, while not perfect, were actually limiting the damage. Palmer rued young people convicted of cannabis possession losing ''rights to be employed in the public service and in the defence forces and in the police services''. Hellish consequences. Gallop, meanwhile, is quoted wondering how Australians can get governments to buy into the issue: ''I think they need to see that what they are doing and not doing is causing a lot of the harms.'' It feels almost churlish to point out that he ran a government from 2001 to 2006. The report was more emotion than fact. Indeed, if you took out references to last year's report by the Global Commission on Drug Policy, the recapping of a background paper prepared ahead of the round table, and various design tricks, the ''new'' information would probably have fitted into half-a-dozen pages. It's probably worth noting at this point that former Federal Court judge Ray Finkelstein, QC, recently produced a 468-page report on the need for a new media regulator, and we are still arguing about that. Fat chance of overturning current drug laws based on an afternoon's chat and a ''report'' that's little more than a brochure. And a highly manipulative brochure, at that. The cover features a couple who look haggard and defeated, presumably by drugs in some way, and a title that goes straight for the heart in capital letters: THE PROHIBITION OF ILLICIT DRUGS IS KILLING AND CRIMINALISING OUR CHILDREN, AND WE ARE ALL LETTING IT HAPPEN. Then, on page two of the report, we hear from Marion and Brian McConnell, founding members of Families and Friends for Drug Law Reform, whose son died from a heroin overdose. ''When we lost our son, we did not seek sympathy, we saw the injustice and craziness of our drug laws,'' the McConnells are quoted as saying. It's heart-wrenching stuff, straight out of the tabloid playbook. But surely this debate needs less emotion, not more? Certainly, it needs more hard evidence than is offered up here. At one point the report notes that the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare says that, in 2010, most Australians aged 14 years and over (60 per cent) had never used an illicit drug. Clearly this did not fit with the consensus view, because the report then offers up this observation: ''Our student participants found these official low prevalence figures hard to believe, arguing that drug use and experimentation are very widespread in the networks they inhabit, and especially at music festivals.'' Are they serious? There were two students in the 24-member round table. The think tank's big coup was to get former NSW premier Bob Carr along to their talkfest in late January, early February. Back then he was just another superannuated politician, but by the time the report was made public he was our Foreign Minister. ''An issue that worried me while I was in NSW politics was the police hitting railway stations with sniffer dogs,'' Carr says. ''It was marijuana that was the focus. I did not think it was the best use of police time.'' Was he advocating a liberalisation of marijuana laws? I think he was. Either that, or for police to go easier on sniffer dogs. Here was a potential story then: new minister at odds with the government's tough-on-drugs stance. I suspect it was this potential flashpoint that attracted the media glare, but it proved illusory. Carr quickly pulled his head in, Gillard restated her opposition to any watering down of drug laws, and there it died. Until next time. Hopefully, when it does come up again, it will be more considered.
Bruce Guthrie @'The Age'
Australia21 Illicit Drug Policy Report
Meanwhile a few words from an asshat...
Legal Loophole May Pave Way For Private Ownership Of Outer Space
Got an extra couple of billion dollars lying around? Need a hot investment tip? To the moon, Alice!
A shift in policy could open up the moon and other celestial bodies to ownership by private companies. Rand Simberg, a space policy consultant, laid out his proposal, called the Space Settlement Prize Act in a paper published April 2 by the libertarian think tank The Competitive Enterprise Institute, according to a report by Wired.
In order for the large-scale colonization of space to move forward, governments such as the U.S. would provide "property rights for those who seek to develop space resources and infrastructure," the draft act states. The proposal places the onus of space exploration on private enterprise rather than taxpayer contributions and, if passed, would signal a radical change in the way we think about outer space.
The 1967 Outer Space Treaty prohibits sovereign nations from owning a celestial body -- such as a planet or asteroid -- and has been ratified by 100 countries, including the United States. But the treaty does not explicitly prohibit ownership of space resources by private enterprises. This is the loophole that Simberg's plan would seek to use, and he plans to shop it around on Capitol Hill, according to Popular Science.
“It would have great potential to kick the development of extraterrestrial resources -- and perhaps even the human settlement of space -- into high gear,” Simberg wrote in the summary of the proposal.
But space attorney Michael Listner maintains that sidestepping the treaty and granting extraterrestrial property rights could provoke political backlash.
"The government would take a hit. It’s sort of a nonstarter," Listner told Wired.
Simberg's plan comes at a time when the U.S. government has made dramatic cuts to its space program. The last space shuttle mission was completed in July 2011. Additionally, a future series of manned deep-space exploration missions, the Constellation program, was cancelled in June 2011. These developments have brought economic hard times on the residents of Brevard County, Fla., as reported by "60 Minutes."
While there is some private interest in space exploration -- Richard Branson's Virgin Galactic enterprise is probably the most familiar name in commercial sub-orbital flight -- there is no clear heir to the large void created by the absence of government-led programs.
In the spirit of American expansion into the old west, Simberg's proposal banks on the assumption that issuing property rights to space resources will create a kind of gold rush that would bring the national economy along for the ride. But with no one to build the wagons -- let alone drive them -- the trail ends where it starts. As yet, there's no destiny to manifest on the final frontier.
Via The Huffington Post
A shift in policy could open up the moon and other celestial bodies to ownership by private companies. Rand Simberg, a space policy consultant, laid out his proposal, called the Space Settlement Prize Act in a paper published April 2 by the libertarian think tank The Competitive Enterprise Institute, according to a report by Wired.
In order for the large-scale colonization of space to move forward, governments such as the U.S. would provide "property rights for those who seek to develop space resources and infrastructure," the draft act states. The proposal places the onus of space exploration on private enterprise rather than taxpayer contributions and, if passed, would signal a radical change in the way we think about outer space.
The 1967 Outer Space Treaty prohibits sovereign nations from owning a celestial body -- such as a planet or asteroid -- and has been ratified by 100 countries, including the United States. But the treaty does not explicitly prohibit ownership of space resources by private enterprises. This is the loophole that Simberg's plan would seek to use, and he plans to shop it around on Capitol Hill, according to Popular Science.
“It would have great potential to kick the development of extraterrestrial resources -- and perhaps even the human settlement of space -- into high gear,” Simberg wrote in the summary of the proposal.
But space attorney Michael Listner maintains that sidestepping the treaty and granting extraterrestrial property rights could provoke political backlash.
"The government would take a hit. It’s sort of a nonstarter," Listner told Wired.
Simberg's plan comes at a time when the U.S. government has made dramatic cuts to its space program. The last space shuttle mission was completed in July 2011. Additionally, a future series of manned deep-space exploration missions, the Constellation program, was cancelled in June 2011. These developments have brought economic hard times on the residents of Brevard County, Fla., as reported by "60 Minutes."
While there is some private interest in space exploration -- Richard Branson's Virgin Galactic enterprise is probably the most familiar name in commercial sub-orbital flight -- there is no clear heir to the large void created by the absence of government-led programs.
In the spirit of American expansion into the old west, Simberg's proposal banks on the assumption that issuing property rights to space resources will create a kind of gold rush that would bring the national economy along for the ride. But with no one to build the wagons -- let alone drive them -- the trail ends where it starts. As yet, there's no destiny to manifest on the final frontier.
Via The Huffington Post
Mungo's Hi Fi ft. Soom T - Roll it
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
