The Olympic Games are highly commercialised. They purport to
follow the traditions of an ancient athletics competition, but today it
is the commercial aspect that is most apparent. I have seen how, through
sport, cities and corporations compete against each other for financial
gain. The Olympics are beholden to the wishes of various commercial
operations, which in turn shape our understanding of the event and of
the world. They are no longer connected to the idea that humanity can be
expressed through athletics.
In
China,
the Olympics have always served as a tool for propaganda. China uses
its gold-medal count to affirm its position in the world order and its
strength as a nation. Many other countries have the same attitude. But
flaunting gold medals, in the guise of fighting for a country's glory,
is done at the expense of many lives. For one, athletes sacrifice their
physical and emotional wellbeing for this vanity. This is a tragedy in
itself.
I don't believe in the so-called Olympic spirit. I speak
from personal experience. When China hosted the Games, it failed to
include the people. The event was constructed without regard for their
joy. The state and the Olympic committee failed to take a position on
many major social and political issues. Afterwards, the state tightened
its controls; China became a police state. "Friendship, fair play,
glory, honour and peace": the Olympic slogan is an empty one.
My memory of the
Beijing Olympics has not changed. It is a fake smile, an elaborate costume party with the sole intention of glorifying the country. From the
opening to the
closing ceremony, from the
torch relay to the cheers for
gold medals
– these all displayed the might, and the desperation, of a totalitarian
regime. Through authoritarian power a country can possess many things,
but it cannot bring joy or happiness to its people.
I see the
Beijing National Stadium as an architectural project. I accepted
Herzog and De Meuron's
invitation to collaborate on the design, and our proposal won the
competition. From beginning to end, I stayed with the project. I am
committed to fostering relationships between a city and its
architecture. I am also keen on encouraging participation and exchange
during mass events that are meaningful for humankind.
I have no regrets about the role I played; the stadium is a work of great quality and design.
I only withdrew from participating in fake performances laden with propaganda. I disagreed with the approach, and did not want my name associated with it. The
Beijing opening ceremony had no sensitivity for the Chinese people; it even had
the police force dancing on the fields. This is the fantasy of a totalitarian society. It was a nightmare.
By
publicly announcing that I would not participate in the opening ceremony, I became a minority, an alternative voice. To the media, I have become a symbolic figure, critical of China.
According to the government, I am a dangerous threat.
I only expressed my personal opinion of an occasion that many people
are passionate about. Unfortunately, such an occasion has no room for
differing stances. Mine posed a challenge to the Games themselves. What
did I say? Only that I didn't like the government propaganda. I don't
feel obliged to approve of it.
I don't watch TV. I did not watch
the Olympics last time; I am not very interested in watching it this
time, either. I have no interest in activities that are dissociated from
the emotions and struggles of everyday people. I enjoy watching any
kind of competition – but it must be carried out in fairness, adhering
strictly to the established rules. Any competition that cannot
demonstrate fairness and abide by a set of openly acknowledged
regulations violates civil society. It is also in conflict with the
principles of human, social and legal rights.
I have visited
London two or three times. I have good impressions of the city. It has a
strong and natural continuity with its traditions. At the same time,
people enjoy their lives and the city is full of culture. It was a
pleasant experience to work with the Serpentine gallery, as well as
Herzog and de Meuron, on
this summer's pavilion. From the response, I can see that Londoners are very savvy about art and architecture.
Tate Modern is also a unique cultural institution, a standard-bearer for quality contemporary art and activities.
I am interested in seeing what the 2012 Olympics has done to London, but
I am not free to travel.
If I were free, I'd like to see how people will respond to the event,
and how members of a different society, living in different social
conditions, will participate in the Games. I don't know how London will
cope, but I believe it will be more relaxed than Beijing. In London, the
people will be able to participate in and celebrate the joy of the
Games.
@
'The Guardian'