Saturday, 15 May 2010

HA!


I can't believe this ad in the Telegraph today. A bone china commemorative mug celebrating the new coalition government. It is just like a Private Eye spoof and the ideal present for Simon Heffer.
According to the ad also available is the Margaret Thatcher 30th anniversary tankard which "makes a perfect matching pair!" Don't tell Maggie.
If you can't believe it click here. 

Rolling Stones to discuss 'Exile on Main Street' reissue in Sirius/XM radio special

A special featuring a conversation with Rolling Stones members Mick Jagger, Keith Richards and Charlie Watts about the making of "Exile on Main Street" will be broadcast on various channels Sirius/XM Radio on May 15-17.
The interview was conducted by producer Don Was, who helped assembled the new reissue of the 1972 album being released on May 18.
During the interview, Was, who has produced Rolling Stones studio albums "Voodoo Lounge" and "A Bigger Bang," as well as the live albums "Stripped" and "Live Licks," will talk with Jagger, Richards and Watts about the process of putting together the re-release of "Exile." The band gave Was access to the master tapes from the sessions and the special will reveal how they uncovered the 10 previously unreleased recordings featured in the re-release.
The in-depth interview will air on several of SIRIUS XM's commercial-free music channels, including Underground Garage, SIRIUS channel 25 and XM channel 59, on Saturday, May 15 at 8:00 pm ET; Outlaw Country, SIRIUS channel 63 and XM channel 12, on Saturday, May 15 at 10:00 pm ET; and Deep Tracks, SIRIUS channel 16 and XM channel 40, on Monday, May 17 at 6:00 pm ET. For additional air times, please visit www.sirius.com or www.xmradio.com

Mountain Man - Soft Skin

    A new offering from Simon Raymonde's Bella Union label

Keith Richards: 'I'm probably more aligned to Lucifer and the dark side'

Keith Richards & Gram Parsons Nellcote 1971
When Keith Richards announced he was going to write his autobiography three years ago, most people didn't believe the Rolling Stones guitarist could remember enough to justify the $5m fee.
Yet, here he is telling me it will be published this October. "I'm waiting for some proofs to come back. It's kind of weird reading about your own life. Who'd be interested in that?" he laughs, sounding not unlike Jack Sparrow, as portrayed by his friend Johnny Depp in the Pirates of the Caribbean franchise. "But then, I realise there is a lot of interest, so... Talking to some of the people that were there and their version of events to try and correlate it all was very interesting, a kind of kaleidoscopic bunch of experiences," he says. He's left his home in Weston, Connecticut, an hour's drive from New York, something he often does with his wife, Patti Hansen, to visit their two daughters. Now he's at the Mercer Hotel, a luxury establishment in New York. No one bats an eyelid when he lights up. The old devil.
That accident added yet another chapter to the already hefty tome of Stones lore, one that Richards has contributed to over the last 45 years, blurring the line between truth and fiction for his own amusement as much as to help cover his tracks. "Someone asked me how I managed to clean up. I was sick of answering that question so I told him I went to Switzerland and had my blood changed. I was just fooling around. That's all it was, a joke."
Exile, the quintessential Stones album and favourite of hardcore fans, is so close to his heart, though, he won't tell fibs about it. So how did the greatest rock'n'roll band in the world end up on the Côte d'Azur in 1971? "The full weight of the British establishment came down on us. First they thought they could get us with the dope busts and it did not work," states Richards, referring to the police finding minute amounts of cannabis resin, Italian prescription pep pills in Mick Jagger's coat and Marianne Faithfull naked in a rug, at his Redlands property in Sussex in February 1967, and the subsequent trial and prison sentence (his conviction was overturned for lack of evidence). "Then they put the financial screws on us," he continues, hinting at the parlous state of the band's finances after a costly split from Allen Klein, their notorious American manager, and the punitive tax bracket their high incomes put them in.
"There was a feeling in the air that we'd reached a schism, a breaking point with certain people, Klein included. To keep the band going, we had to leave England. There was a lot of determination that we could do what we do anywhere. France was convenient," he explains. "We figured that either in Cannes, Nice or Marseilles, maybe we could find a studio that we liked. After that fell through, everyone looked at me. I thought: 'I know what they want, they want my basement.' That's how I ended up living on top of the factory."
The factory, or "old Nellcôte" as the guitarist fondly remembers it, "was a fantastic place upstairs. The basement was another story. It hadn't been used for years. It was ugly and dark and damp. It was funky, I'll give you that," he laughs. "I don't think we really bothered to clean it up much. We just kind of moved in. It was a great room to work. It was a little crazy, a bit of an experiment because we'd never recorded outside of a studio before."
They had used the Rolling Stones Mobile Studio to capture their farewell-to-the-UK dates in March 1971 and to cut demos at Stargroves, Jagger's country pile in Berkshire, but it really proved useful when parked on the French Riviera. "Having the truck made it possible. The thing actually worked," stresses Richards. "We were amazed. It was a lovely machine, for its time. You'd do a few takes, and then everybody would stamp up the stairs, get in the truck and have a listen. It was a pretty unique way of making a record. There was something about the rhythm section sound down there – maybe it was the concrete, or maybe the dirt – but it had a certain sound that you couldn't replicate. Believe me, lots of people have tried."
An infectious rhythmic swagger infused "Tumbling Dice", the lead-off single from Exile, and "Happy", Richards' signature song. "Sometimes, you come up with something you could play all night. 'Tumbling Dice' has got such a nice groove and a flow on it," he muses. "Living on top of the whole scene had its advantages. 'Happy' epitomised that. One afternoon, Jimmy Miller [the producer] was on drums and Bobby Keys on baritone sax, but that was about it. The guys didn't usually start work until after dark. I said: 'Look, I've got this idea. Can we just lay it down for later?' By the time the rest of the band arrived, I'd done a few overdubs and we had finished the track. I'd captured it before anybody else knew it existed. I play 'Happy' quite a lot. It's not usually my genre. I'm not known for happy and joyful stuff. I'm probably more aligned to Lucifer and the dark side. But it was a damn good afternoon and I still love it."
There was one flaw in the masterplan: the flow of visitors documented by the photographer Dominique Tarlé in the coffee-table book Exile: The Making of Exile on Main St – a favourite of Richards. "Ah, Dominique, great guy. We liked Dominique because he was the most invisible photographer. You never knew he was there, he melted in and became part of the band. I was amazed by the book. I didn't know he'd taken that many pictures. A lot of people that you didn't intend to be there, like Gram Parsons, ended up at Nellcôte, and stayed for a month. Gram is on Exile in spirit. The good die young."
Nevertheless, the guitarist is adamant that extra-curricular activities didn't deter the group from focusing on music. "Yes, you can call it a vibe, it was a thick one," he says with a smile. "Of course, there were drugs, but it didn't affect the work. We were making a record, we didn't have time!"
The months spent at Nellcôte have been described as hedonistic but he recalls comedy moments. "There was a chef, Big Jacques, who blew the kitchen up. There was a great explosion," he gesticulates. "We had a couple of local Villefranche boys working for us. Yes, they did hook us to the railway line a couple of times when the power went. The gendarmes were very reasonable in their Mediterranean way. Sometimes, they just wanted to come around and have a look. You stand outside the front gate with the sergeant. 'Monsieur, excusez-moi.' Usually, things would settle down and you'd say: 'Come in, have a cognac.' We did have a robbery and we got some of the guitars back. Justice prevailed. We'll leave it at that. The lady caretaker was great. How she put up with us all... The smile on her face all the time. I don't quite know what she was smiling at but she handled us very correctly. I have fond memories of playing and working there. There could be worse places to make a record."
Kicking off with the out-and-out rockers "Rocks Off" and "Rip This Joint", Exile also saw the Stones explore a more gospel-flavoured, soulful direction. "Yeah, strangely enough, once we were in the middle of France, we started to dig deep into American music. After all, basically, that's what we do," reflects Richards. "But we started to pull on different aspects of it, country music for instance, gospel. Maybe, because we weren't in America, we missed it."
In fact, even if Exile is presented as the album the Stones made on the lam, chunks of it had already been recorded at Olympic Studios, London, where they'd made three previous albums. Exile was completed at Sunset Sound in LA between November 1971 and February 1972. "In order to mix it and to do certain overdubs, we needed rather more sophisticated equipment than what we had in our truck. That was the reason we took it there: to polish it, give it a little touch of Hollywood. The great thing about LA, especially in those days, you could make a phone call at three in the morning and say: 'We need a couple of voices.' Within half an hour, there'd be a couple of chicks ready to go, still wearing their nightdresses," he adds with a glint in his eye. "It was like that. You'd have an idea and it would actually happen, which was kind of cool."
Exile is now seen as the high watermark in the band's canon, but it wasn't in 1972. "Maybe because it was a double album. We had to fight the record company about that. We insisted it was a double," recalls Richards about Atlantic, which distributed the recently launched Rolling Stones label around the world. "We knew that there was going to be a reaction to it, just because it was very different. There was no hit singles. It was an album by itself. There was a lot of determination in the band to step up to the plate and make an interesting record. They'd kicked us out of England. We were the exiles. That's why the album ended up being called Exile on Main St. We were very aware that we were suddenly out there, with our backs to the wall. We had to make it up as we went along. There was no script, nobody had done it before. We were reinventing the Stones as we went along. It was a miracle it happened, quite honestly. The Stones had this streak of what do you want to call it, luck, bonne chance.
"In a way, we were growing up along with the audience," says the guitarist. "The tracks we found in the vault are mostly as we left them 39 years ago. I can hear stuff and go: 'Oh, my God, did I actually play that?' Sometimes you just take off. The spirit, the feel of it, it's well worth putting it out, because it's the flavour of the era. I stroked an acoustic guitar here and there. Mick did new vocals for 'Plundered My Soul' and 'Following the River'. We had to draw the line somewhere. We decided that, if we were going to repackage and put Exile out as a box-set, then we should add some of the other stuff that we had left over. When you make records, these things sort of fold over. There's stuff from Sticky Fingers that went into Exile at one end and out of the other into Goats Head Soup. Nobody writes an album from track one to track 12 and says: 'that's it'. It's a continual process and hopefully it will continue."
Stones fans have been spoiled with the expanded Get Yer Ya-Ya's Out! and now Exile, but what's on the cards? "Nobody's going to make a decision about what we're going to do until we get further into 2010," says Richards. "No doubt the guys are going to want to talk about whether we're going to record and go on the road in one form or another. Maybe we're going to talk about doing it differently. There's going to be a lot of that. I would tell you if I knew."
'Exile on Main St' is reissued by Polydor on 17 May. The documentary 'Exile of the Stones' is on Radio 2 on 19 May at 10pm
Pierre Perrone @'The Independent' 

Robert Del Naja - Heligoland Paintings

Ex-minister Stephen Timms stabbed at constituency event

Republicans vandalize history classroom

Maine Republicans, using a public school classroom for its party convention, are accused of removing offending posters and searching the room for anti-American propaganda
MORE

Friday, 14 May 2010

Sir Mick Jagger goes back to Exile

Forty years ago, the Rolling Stones decamped to the South of France, living as tax exiles as they recorded their tenth album.
The sessions became notorious for their bacchanalian excesses, taking place amidst a nine-month, non-stop cocktail party in a sprawling villa that had supposedly once been a headquarters for the Gestapo.
The result was a sprawling double album, Exile On Main Street, which has gone down in history as one of the band's best.
Next week, they are re-releasing the record with 10 new tracks - including several recently rediscovered songs. An accompanying documentary, Stones In Exile, will premiere in Cannes, before screening on BBC One on Sunday, 23 May.
Frontman Sir Mick Jagger met up with BBC arts editor Will Gompertz to explain why the band had gone back to the archives - and whether the band would ever get back together.

The new tracks on Exile On Main Street have been promoted as "recently rediscovered". How lost were they?
Well, they weren't really lost. It was just no-one had really looked at them. There wasn't a bag at the bottom of someone's drawer.
Exile On Main Street cover
The patchwork album cover was created by photographer Robert Frank
Where were they?
They were in our tape store, mouldering away. Tapes don't have a very good shelf life - so you bake them in the oven, get them out, play them and transfer them to somewhere else.
And then the process started of listening to them and going, "that's really a good one".
What sort of state were the songs in?
They were mostly instrumental tracks with no vocals on them. They didn't have vocals, they didn't have melodies... because I wasn't there. I was playing maracas or I was playing harmonica or something.
But some of [them] were complete. There's a track called I'm Not Signifying and all I did was play harmonica on it. It's quite an early track.
It sounds early. It could fit onto the Beggars' Banquet album.
It might have been recorded for Beggars, but it was definitely re-recorded in the [Exile] period. A lot of these songs were done more than once.
Did you put them to one side because you didn't like them at the time?
We had so many tracks, and you can only do so much. You'd say, "we'll save that one, or put it aside" not knowing that we'd put it aside for 40 years!
So I just found some of these ones and finished them off - I wrote the words and the lyrics.
Would you describe these records as new ones or old ones?
They're both, really. [Record producer] Don Was, who's a real Stones aficionado, said, "you've got to do them in the mood of Exile". We had tremendous arguments late at night about whether that was correct, artistically.
Mick Jagger and Marianne Faithfull in 1970
Work on the album started in 1969, when Jagger was dating Marianne Faithfull
How do you get yourself back into the mood you had in 1971?
By listening to Exile, of course! But it's not particularly difficult, technically. It's just an attitude in your head when you're singing. Don Was said that in those days there wasn't a tremendous amount of subtlety. You just started and then, wham, barraged on 'til you finished.
But what about writing the lyrics now, as opposed to where your head was then?
Now that's a different thing. Of course it's totally different. But you can put your head in a "mood". That's what any writing is like. You've got to be able to.
People say, "is a song written from your own experience?" The answer is "of course it isn't!" Bits of it are your experience, bits of things you've learnt off other people, bits you've nicked from other people's lives, and bits you read in a newspaper. And all this goes to make a song, a novel or a play.
And so with all this, you're playing a part. And in a way, I suppose, I was playing the part of myself in 1971.
How accurate is the mythology surrounding the recording of Exile On Main Street?
The wild nights, the orgies, the drug taking! I remember it well. Every bit of it!
I mean, it was a lot of fun - but there were a few bumps. It was a bumpy period, historically. There was a war going on, the Nixon thing was happening. Tax was through the roof. It was very difficult. The end of the '60s felt very strained.
But despite all the excesses, it was quite a creative period. When you're quite young, you can get away with that.
What was the environment like down at the house?
I think it was quite simple, really. The basement was for work, and nobody came in there who wasn't working.
Upstairs was quite a lot of socialising and carrying on. All day.
It was great fun and it got a bit out of hand, and then we left. It felt like forever, but actually it was only six or seven months.
How much did the environment contribute to the album?
It was very social, we had a lot of children. They weren't singing on the record, but there was quite a family thing.
If you record in that atmosphere, you're going to get a different kind of record. It's almost impossible to quantify how that is, but you just are going to get a different record. Every endeavour is influenced by its environment.
How was your relationship with Keith at that time? This was his house…
It was his rented house! He rented it for a year and he never went back!
The Rolling Stones play Canada in 2005
The Stones' Bigger Bang tour earned $558m - the highest-grossing tour ever
What was the hardest point in those years?
It was really problematic getting into the United States. It was massively difficult. The uncertainty of knowing whether you could go to America to tour was one of the major uncertainties of that period.
Things have obviously changed a great deal since those sessions. What's your feeling on technology and music?
Technology and music have been together since the beginning of recording.
I'm talking about the internet.
But that's just one facet of the technology of music. Music has been aligned with technology for a long time. The model of records and record selling is a very complex subject and quite boring, to be honest.
But your view is valid because you have a huge catalogue, which is worth a lot of money, and you've been in the business a long time, so you have perspective.
Well, it's all changed in the last couple of years. We've gone through a period where everyone downloaded everything for nothing and we've gone into a grey period it's much easier to pay for things - assuming you've got any money.
Are you quite relaxed about it?
I am quite relaxed about it. But, you know, it is a massive change and it does alter the fact that people don't make as much money out of records.
But I have a take on that - people only made money out of records for a very, very small time. When The Rolling Stones started out, we didn't make any money out of records because record companies wouldn't pay you! They didn't pay anyone!
Then, there was a small period from 1970 to 1997, where people did get paid, and they got paid very handsomely and everyone made money. But now that period has gone.
So if you look at the history of recorded music from 1900 to now, there was a 25 year period where artists did very well, but the rest of the time they didn't.
What about the future. Are you going to get back together and write more music?
I think that would be a very good idea. I've been writing quite a lot of music.
Is Keith keen to get the guitar out?
I'm sure he is. And I'll be seeing him next week, so I'm sure we'll get together and start doing that.
You can watch the video of this interview there.

City of London security guards told to report 'suspicious' photographers

 A security guard at  Canary Wharf, London.

A security guard on patrol in Canary Wharf. Photograph: Andy Rain/EPA

More than 5,000 security guards in London's financial district have been instructed by police to report people taking photographs, recording footage or even making sketches near buildings, the Guardian has learned.
City of London police's previously unseen advice singles out people who may appear to be "legitimate tourists" to prevent reconnaissance by al-Qaida.
The document, obtained under the Freedom of Information Act, helps explain a number of recent cases in which photographers have been stopped and searched by police using section 44 of the Terrorism Act, after first being approached by security guards.
There has been concern over the misuse of section 44, which allows officers to stop and search anyone without need for suspicion in designated areas. It has been repeatedly used to question tourists, photographers and film-makers. Cases have also been documented where artists have been stopped from painting in the street.
The police advice to security guards states: "In this period of heightened alert, we must report possible reconnaissance to the police and develop a culture of challenging suspicious behaviour."
Under "examples of suspicious behaviour", the document lists people spotted in stationary vehicles watching buildings or who ask "detailed or unusual questions" about a location. It was warns about people seen "loitering at or near premises for long period" and advises guards to be alert to "overheard conversations that indicate suspicious intent".
Another category of suspicious behaviour is described as: "People using recording equipment, including camera phones, or seen making notes or sketches for no apparent reason". One line in the document, marked in bold, states: "The person you think is a legitimate tourist may be somebody else!"
There is no reference to the legal rights of photographers, or the need to treat members of the public cordially.
The advice is part of Project Griffin, a police initiative to ensure private security personnel function as their "eyes and ears" to combat crime and terrorism. Most police forces and several ports across the UK have co-opted the scheme. City of London police alone have held 67 training days under the initiative.
Both the Association of Chief Police Officers (Acpo) and John Yates, Britain's most senior counter-terrorism officer, have warned that police risk losing the support of the public through the inappropriate use of section 44.
Earlier this year, the European court of human rights ruled that the "arbitrary" stop and search under section 44 without suspicion was illegal.
But while many senior police officers have sought to rein-back the use of the powers by encouraging their officers to use "common sense", City of London police, which has jurisdiction of London's Square Mile, has sought to defend the action of its officers and highlight the importance of vigilance.
In December the architectural photographer, Grant Smith, was stopped while photographing the spire of Sir Christopher Wren's Christ Church. This week he was stopped again as he took images of the skyline at One Aldermanbury Square.
He said two uniformed officers detained him, one by grabbing his arms behind his back, and they refused requests to record the stop and search on his camera. On both occasions, Smith was first questioned by a security guard who asked him not to photograph a nearby building.
Paul Lewis @'The Guardian'

Arkell v Pressdram (1971)

More on the Johanna Kaschke libel trial :
"...Check out the links here, here, here about the whole sorry silly tale of how a former Labour Party member who failed to be a Parliamentary candidate defected to Respect then turned to the Communist Part of Great Britain then the Communist Party of Britain then the Labour Party again and finally (for now) joined the Conservative Party - all within a few months. Who then went on to waste tens of thousands of pounds of public money by taking out multiple libel actions and court applications that were doomed to fail. There has probably by now been millions of pages of documents wasted and thousands of hours of court administration officers and officials time used up. An incredible number of different expensive direction hearings, applications and appeals. Imagine how much Royal Court of Justice Masters and Judges are paid per day and how much nonsense they had to read and listen to!..." 
Oh and if you want a really good laugh then google the title of this post!
Hey I get a mention in her blog...

Liverpool FC fans set to take Premier League to task over Gillett and Hicks

Liverpool supporters battling George Gillett and Tom Hicks' ownership of the club will meet with senior Premier League officials in the next 48 hours.
 Representatives of Spirit of Shankly, the Liverpool Supporters' Union, will travel to London today to meet with chief executive Richard Scudamore and a number of key personnel at Gloucester Place to discuss their 'fit and proper' person test for new owners of clubs.
Members bombarded League chiefs with emails in March, demanding answers into how the test failed to expose the irregularities in the Americans' dealings prior to their Anfield takeover, particularly Hicks' controversial spell as co-owner of Brazilian side Corinthians.
James McKenna, spokesperson for Spirit of Shankly, said: “The Premier League have a duty to run the game properly, to regulate it and make sure it is protected.
"However, they don’t seem to take this duty seriously, allowing the debts at Liverpool to pile up, with owners who are far from fit and proper.
"Sadly, we aren’t the only club this is happening to, it is happening to many others, and the fans are the ones left to fight for their clubs.”
It emerged that new Reds chairman Martin Broughton has refused to meet with the group to discuss the progress of the club being sold, claiming he would 'continue communicating with all fans collectively'.
Accounts published last week revealed that the club's debts have risen to £351million following loans taken out against it by Gillett and Hicks, and McKenna called for accountability from the Premier League to avoid a repeat of the problems at Liverpool, Manchester United and Portsmouth.
He added: “We would like to the Premier League to better protect clubs and put in place regulation that stops what has happened with Hicks and Gillett from happening all over again.
 "It isn’t right or proper that a club should pay for it’s owners to actually own them, and it isn’t proper for the future and the finances of a club to be put in jeopardy for the sake of business and making a profit.
"Those in charge need to act, and they need to act now, before its all too late.”
As Broughton prepares to meet manager Rafael Benitez for further showdown talks in London tonight, Hicks has suffered a crucial blow in his bid to sell his controlling stake in the Texas Rangers after Major League Baseball stepped up its efforts to reclaim the club.
Hicks had agreed a deal with Pittsburg attorney Chuck Greenberg and the club's former pitcher Nolan Ryan but current lenders of the franchise are reportedly planning to file papers to involuntarily place the club into bankruptcy.
Richrd Buxton @'Liverpool Click'

"Fookin' banks on fookin' sherts!"
I still have a Crown Paint, a Candy and countless Carlsbergs but...think I will give this one a miss!

'This is beyond sports' - Chuck D on the fight in Arizona

When Arizona passes an unjust immigration law, Chuck D is on hand to criticise it. After all, the Man from Public Enemy once rapped “By The Time I Get To Arizona” when state officials refused to recognise Martin Luther King’s birthday.
Chuck D. The Hard Rhymer. The man on the mic for the most politically explosive hip-hop group in history, Public Enemy. With albums like “It Takes a Nation of Millions to Hold Us Back,” “Fear of a Black Planet,” and anthems like “Fight the Power” and “Bring the Noise” along with the breathtaking production of the Bomb Squad, PE created a standard of politics and art.
Perhaps their most controversial track was “By the Time I Get to Arizona” (1991) about seeking revenge against Arizona political officials for refusing to recognize Dr. Martin Luther King’s birthday [Lyrics include: ‘Cause my money’s spent on The goddamn rent/Neither party is mine not the Jackass or the elephant.]
Today, in the wake of Arizona’s draconian anti-immigration Senate Bill 1070, “By the Time I Get to Arizona” has been remixed and revived by DJ Spooky. Chuck D also recorded his own track several months before the bill was passed called “Tear Down That Wall.” I spoke to Chuck about the music and the nexus between immigration politics and sports.
DAVE ZIRIN: Why did you choose to record “Tear Down this Wall?”
CHUCK D: I had done “Tear Down this Wall” four or five months ago because I heard a professor who works with my wife here on the West Coast speak in a speech about the multi-billion dollar dividing wall between the U.S. and Mexico, so, therefore, I based “Tear Down that Wall” on the policy of the United States border patrol in the states of Arizona, California, New Mexico and Texas.
I just wanted to put a twist of irony on it saying if Ronald Reagan back in 1988 had told Mr. Gorbachev to tear down that wall separating the world from countries of capitalism and communism, we have a billion dollar wall right here in our hemisphere that exists that needs to have a bunch of questions raised. Questions like: “What the Hell?”
I wrote the song about five months ago and I did it coincidently, with all that’s brewing in the state of Arizona. Immigration laws and racial profiling is happening right here and I think the border situation, not only with the U.S. and Mexico but the U.S. and Canada, on both sides is just out of control. It’s crazy.
You did “Tear Down This Wall,” we have the DJ Spooky remix of “By the Time I Get to Arizona,” and with your wife, Dr. Gaye Theresa Johnson, you wrote a syndicated column on SB 1070. What’s the response been to you being so out front on this issue?
Well the response is the usual, but I make it a habit not to look at any blogs, because I think the font of a computer gives as much credence to ignorance as it does to somebody who makes sense. So I try not to read those responses, because anybody can respond quickly. Back when people had to write letters it took an effort, especially if someone didn’t have decent penmanship and handwriting.
I try not to look at the responses. I try to do the right thing. I tell you this much, there is a rap contingent, a hip-hop contingent from Phoenix, who did a remake of “By the Time I Get to Arizona.” I think that needs to be recognized because these are young people. The song is about eight minutes long. There’re about 12 MCs on it, and they are putting it down. They are talking about how ridiculous this law is. They are speaking out against it and they are putting all the facts on the table, and they need to be acknowledged and highlighted. There is a stereotype about young people and young MCs [being apolitical]. They break it.
It’s remarkable how the original “By the Time I Get to Arizona” has been resurrected from the early ’90s now that the struggle has picked up. Did you hear former NBA player Chris Webber before the Suns/Spurs game say, “It’s like PE said ‘By the Time I get to Arizona’”?
[laughs] My dad told me about that, you know Chris Webber is the man. I wasn’t tuned into TNT at that particular time.
He said more than that. He said, “Public Enemy said it a long time ago. ‘By the Time I Get to Arizona.’ I’m not surprised. They didn’t even want there to be a Martin Luther King Day when John McCain was in [office.]. So if you follow history you know that this is part of Arizona politics.’” So he brought it all together with Public Enemy at the center of it.
Unfortunately when it comes to culture, the speed of technology and news today makes things out of sight, out of mind. While these situations [the MLK fight and the immigration fights] are different, the politics of both things stay around like a stain… Once again Arizona has put themselves into this mix.

Immigration laws and racial profiling is happening right here and I think the border situation, not only with the U.S. and Mexico but the U.S. and Canada, on both sides is just out of control. It’s crazy.

I don’t know what the hell was on Gov. Jan Brewer’s mind or what contingent is behind her, but, you know, to make a decision like this and to be told to ignore the people who have been in this area on this earth the longest period of time. It just kind of resonates with me as being crazy.
Do you support an athletic or artistic boycott of Arizona until this gets settled?
Dave, you know I do. Artists and musicians can say we’re going to play Texas, El Paso, New Mexico, Albuquerque, and we gotta play L.A. But we’ll skip Phoenix, Flagstaff, Tucson and the like. But you know what this is really a challenge for: that’s Major League Baseball.
You’ve got nearly a third of the players that are Latino. If they don’t stand up to this bill, they will actually be validating the divide amongst Latinos [between documented and undocumented immigrants]. At the same time they’ll also be lining themselves right into the stereotype of what an athlete is if they don’t speak out: a high-priced slave that doesn’t say anything.
And, to me, it’s beyond just boycotting the All-Star game. What are those Latino players on the Diamondbacks going to do? What are the players going to say who go into Arizona to play against the Diamondbacks? What are they going to say and what are they going to do? Major League Baseball has to step up.
The NBA has very few players of Latino descent and [the Suns] are saying something. But Major League Baseball, if they don’t say anything, it’s crazy. The owners, the team, the league, and especially the players, whether they come from the Dominican Republic, whether they come from Venezuela, whether they come from Puerto Rico, they better step up.
If they don’t step up, the music industry, at least from my area, we’re going to clown them. For us to speak out against this law, and basketball stepping up, and Major League Baseball not stepping up at all?! Come on now, give me a break. And I know a lot of the cats they live in the Dominican Republic or Puerto Rico or whatever, there’s like a trillion years difference between them and their high salaries and the average people living in the streets.
They might build themselves a castle with a militia to protect them, but this is the time to unite yourself with the people and at least live in the legacy that [Major League Hall of Famer] Roberto Clemente set of uniting people just to protect against the nonsense that the other side can come up with. They need to know that it’s going to spread if they don’t come up and say something about it.
Any final thoughts? Perhaps about Major League Baseball pulling the All Star Game out of Phoenix?
At the end of the day man, sports is really not that important compared to people living their everyday lives. Say you have a Major League player, and he happens to play for another team, or he happens to play for the Diamondbacks and he gets pulled over because people think he’s an illegal immigrant. Then all of a sudden that’s when the “ish” finally hits the fan? Come on. This is beyond sports.
We want athletes to speak up because they have advantages. They have everyday coverage. They’re covered by a person that has a mic and a camera in their face, and this is the time to step up. Major League Baseball pulling the All-Star game out of Arizona should be the least of it.
Dave Zirin @'Edge of Sports'
Click here for a free download of Chuck D and DJ Spooky’s “By The Time I Get To Arizona.”
قدرت مطلق بدون هیچ نظارتی فساد
 آور است

BTW

Just checking the stats of 'Exile' related stuff that went up at (Son of) yesterday and to date just over 320 downloads w/ not one 'thank you'. Could be a new world record...