Margaret Aspinall (right) and Anne Williams at St George's Hall in
Liverpool for the vigil for the 96 victims of the Hillsborough disaster.
Photograph: Peter Powell.
A few days on from the Hillsborough report,
one powerful image abides. It is of three stoic women, speaking with
power and clarity about the struggles they've endured these past 23
years. Two of them, Margaret Aspinall and Anne Williams, lost their
sons, respectively James, 18, and Kevin, 15, at the 1989 FA Cup
semi-final.
The third woman, Sheila Coleman, spokeswoman for the
Hillsborough Justice Campaign, has faced a different kind of struggle.
Her task has been to keep the appalling injustices of the disaster in
the public eye, so that fellow mothers such as Margaret and Anne could,
finally, get the world to accept what they had been saying with patient
insistence. That their sons went to that football match in peace; that
they did not contribute to their own deaths; that their lives could have
been saved, and that the real architects of the Hillsborough tragedy
are still at large, still unaccountable.
This was a tragedy with
deep roots. For those who lean to the left, it's too easy to utter the
word "Thatcher" and to link her government with everything wretched that
happened in the 1980s. But it's enough, for now, to note that the style
of government she fostered brought a confrontational atmosphere to
everyday life. In the form of Thatcher herself, and her ally Norman
Tebbit, there was little trace of any form of patrician Tory
benevolence. Their credo seemed more akin to a rigid take on national
identity whereby every True Brit toed the line and worked hard,
uncomplainingly, for whatever they were given. Anyone who bucked against
the Tories' values was deemed a "wrecker." The play-out to the Tom
Robinson Band's 1979 song Power In The Darkness lists a catalogue of
"wreckers" including "… football hooligans, juvenile delinquents,
lesbians and left-wing scum."
Among those toeing the line, of
course, were the police. There are reasons for their apparent sense of
immunity. Early on, the Conservatives implemented a 45% pay rise for the
force. Unsurprisingly, this fostered a spirit of kinship and loyalty
among the nation's constabularies. Simultaneously, the government
started into its programme of wage cuts and closures in the nationalised
industries. Which inevitably set police on a collision course with
pickets as industrial action escalated in the early 1980s.
Also,
there seemed little sympathy in their ranks for those living in the
nation's poorest communities. Complaints were rife that newly ordained
snatch squads were abusing their powers of stop-and-search (the hugely
unpopular "Suss" process) to humiliate peaceable citizens. Resentment
smouldered in multi-ethnic quarters such as Brixton and St Paul's,
Bristol, where the overriding feeling was that law and order did not
apply to the forces tasked with imposing it.
With unemployment
rocketing from 1.5 million in May 1979 to nearly 3 million by the end of
1980, these communities further felt a complete disenfranchisement from
any likelihood of work. So the Brixton riots of April 1981 came as no
surprise; neither did the disturbances that flared up in Toxteth, Liverpool, a few months later.
A
year or two after Power In The Darkness, Tom Robinson might have added
"scousers" to that ironic list of demons. The 1980s oversaw a radical
transformation in Liverpool's national standing and its citizens'
popular perception. Gone were the lovable Merseybeat bands of the 1960s,
and the daffy but adorable Liver Birds. In their place came a family of
incorrigible scroungers, in Bread, followed by a litany of skivers, whingers and whiners in Brookside and Boys from the Blackstuff.
Just
as the mop top came to symbolise a certain Liverpudlian elan, so the
hackneyed bubble perm, worn with a sloppy tracksuit and a defiant
moustache, stereotyped the workshy scouser of Thatcher's Britain.
Whereas the previous generation's assumption was that Liverpudlians were
gregarious, generous, witty and creative, the 1980s version were viewed
as chippy, aggressive and innately inclined towards criminality.
And
then there was Militant. Even among lifelong Labour voters, opinions
are polarised to this day over Liverpool's Militant-dominated city
council of the early 1980s. Most believe their regime was in part
responsible for Liverpool's acute downturn. But we now know that, in the
wake of the Toxteth riots, Chancellor Geoffrey Howe urged Thatcher to
abandon Liverpool to a programme of "managed decline." In those
circumstances, it was going to take a different brand of local
government simply to arrest that decline, let alone reverse it. Yet the
sharp suits and fondness for the limelight of the council's de facto
leader Derek Hatton only added fuel to the anti-Liverpudlian pyre.
By
that time Mrs Thatcher had been re-elected, and the growing sense that
the police did her bidding was palpable. Having gained experience and,
perhaps, harbouring grudges from the riots of 1981, the mounted police
took no nonsense from the pickets at Orgreave at the culmination of the
miners' strike of 1984. Their actions were so violent that the Police
And Criminal Evidence Act was re-drafted to include a code of conduct
for police, as well as suspects.
In football, in the English first
division, crowds were on the decline and hooliganism was on the rise.
With outside broadcast units joining the rest of nation on strike in the
1980s, it went almost unnoticed that Liverpool and Everton won the
league championship almost every year.
But the 1984-85 season was marred by violence at football grounds, culminating in tragedy when 39 Juventus
supporters died at the European Cup final in Brussels after they were
charged by Liverpool fans. Mrs Thatcher demanded solutions to the
British Disease, and nothing – ID cards, electric fences – was
considered too draconian. In the event, the culture of football violence
ended organically the following season when ecstasy-fuelled Acid House
ushered in a new era of communality.
It was against this social
backdrop, then, that the events of 15 April 1989 unfolded at
Hillsborough. Four of us set off by car from Liverpool that morning.
There was a prolonged tailback across the Snake Pass, meaning we didn't
get into Sheffield until after one. It's absurd to suggest that nobody
approaching the ground had had a drink, but I'd seriously doubt that
anybody had time to get seriously drunk. It's equally pat to say that
everyone had tickets – but the touts soon put paid to that. They were
virtually giving tickets away on the walk-up to Hillsborough.
As
the Leppings Lane end of the ground came into sight, and the singing
amplified, so the crowd flow simply stopped. We waited. There was no
information. Understandably, the police were jumpy. These were football
hooligans they were facing down. Liverpool fans. Scousers. Militants.
The worst sort of wreckers. Everybody knows, now, what happened next.
The
prime minister's apology carried symbolic value as it represented an
owning-up to corruption that went to the heart of the Establishment.
That, for me, was a historic admission. As for the later apologies –
from Sun editors past and present Dominic Mohan and Kelvin
MacKenzie, the FA – they're worthless. They only came as a result of the
culprits finally realising they had no choice but to apologise.
On
that day in 89, I was among the fortunate ones who went left, where
others went straight ahead. For 23 years, those of us who were at that
game to support Liverpool have had to endure, at best, the suggestion
that somehow we were responsible for the deaths of our fellow fans. Or
to listen to the wretched line of "just get over it". For Margaret
Aspinall and Anne Williams, it has been far, far worse. I'm in awe of
them, and Sheila Coleman – the women who just wouldn't let it lie.
Kevin Sampson @'The Guardian'
Monday, 17 September 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment