“James Clapper Is Still Lying”: That would be a more honest headline for
yesterday’s big Washington Post article about the director of national intelligence’s letter to the U.S. Senate.
Clapper, you may recall, unequivocally said “no, sir” in response to Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., asking him: “Does the NSA collect any type of data at all on millions or hundreds of millions of Americans?” Clapper’s response was shown to be a lie by Snowden’s disclosures, as well as by reports from the
Guardian,
the Washington Post,
the Associated Press and
Bloomberg News (among others). This is particularly significant, considering lying before Congress prevents the legislative branch from performing oversight and is therefore a felony.
Upon Snowden’s disclosures, Clapper initially explained his lie by insisting that his answer was carefully and deliberately calculated to be the
“least untruthful” response to a question about classified information. Left unmentioned was the fact that he could have simply given the same truthful answer that
Alberto Gonzales gave the committee in 2006...