Bulldog Breed: Made In England 1969
1 hour ago
Wednesday 25 July 2012
Tuesday 24 July 2012
Hollie Cook - Vieilles Charrues 20/07/2012 (Full Concert)
With Sex Pistols and one-time Slits drummer Paul Cook for a father, it comes as quite a surprise that West London vocalist Hollie Cook's self-titled debut album completely abandons her punk past in favor of an old-school reggae vibe, self-described as "tropical pop". Produced by Prince Fatty and featuring the likes of Dennis Bovell, and Omar & the Pioneers ' George Dekker, its ten tracks certainly come equipped with a pretty authentic pedigree but luckily, Cook's musical upbringing ensures that she's never overshadowed by the impressive roll call of guest musicians. Blessed with an enchantingly sweet voice which sits somewhere between the laissez faire attitude of Lily Allen and the softly spoken, melancholic tones of Morcheeba's Skye, particularly on the trip-hop-tinged cover of Rachel Sweet's "It's So Different Here," her laid-back delivery effortlessly recalls the lover's rock of Janet Kay and Phyllis Dillon which inspired the change in direction. But while the optimistic rendition of the Shangri-Las' "Walking in the Sand," which layers the doo wop classic with baritone brass hooks and roots reggae riddims, and the dreamy ska-pop of "Milk and Honey," a collaboration with Prince Fatty which previously appeared on Grey's Anatomy, are the perfect foil for Cook, the original material is just a little too repetitive to provide the same spark. Indeed, only the slightly psychedelic "Shadow Kissing" and the echo-laden dub of "Sugar Water (Look at My Face)" deviate from the album's formula of Hammond organs, brass riffs, and skank guitars, which makes it hard to distinguish between the likes of "That Very Night," "Cry," and "Used to Be." But despite its samey nature, Hollie Cook still heralds the arrival of a hugely promising reggae talent, who should have no problem in outlasting the short-lived '70s career of her father's iconic band.
(Jon O'Brien - allmusic)
Does it come as a shock to anyone
that the Mirror doesn't know the difference between breaking an embargo
and getting a "world exclusive"?
♪♫ Old Apparatus - Derren
Old Apparatus - Electronic Explorations Mix
01 – Old Apparatus – 15:24-15:46 – [Forthcoming 'The Tapeworm']
02 – Old Apparatus – untitled – [unreleased]
03 – Old Apparatus – untitled – [unreleased]
04 – Old Apparatus – untitled – [unreleased]
05 – Old Apparatus – untitled – [unreleased]
06 – Old Apparatus – untitled – [unreleased]
07 – Old Apparatus – untitled – [unreleased]
08 – Old Apparatus – untitled – [unreleased]
09 – Old Apparatus – untitled – [unreleased]
10 – Old Apparatus – untitled – [unreleased]
11 – Old Apparatus – untitled – [unreleased]
12 – Old Apparatus ft Paper Dollhouse – untitled [unreleased]
13 – Old Apparatus – untitled [unreleased]
14 – Old Apparatus – 15:24-15:46 – [Forthcoming 'The Tapeworm']
15 – Old Apparatus – Hand to mouth
Download
Monday 23 July 2012
This graph about declining U.S. assault rates http://nyti.ms/NMrRLY is pretty amazing when you consider this one http://bit.ly/NYzZwR
Sgt. Nick Amann's Re-enlistment Speech (A MUST WATCH!)
Via
Sergeant Nicholas Amann’s re-enlistment ceremony was not typical by any means. Sgt. Amann is not your typical soldier. He’s prior-infantry but re-classed to chaplain’s assistant so he could help other soldiers. He’s also an atheist.
Absolute Ultimate Respect Sir!
Sergeant Nicholas Amann’s re-enlistment ceremony was not typical by any means. Sgt. Amann is not your typical soldier. He’s prior-infantry but re-classed to chaplain’s assistant so he could help other soldiers. He’s also an atheist.
Absolute Ultimate Respect Sir!
(Thanx Robin!)
Making A Home For John Coltrane's Legacy
But Ravi Coltrane, the son of John and Alice Coltrane, who was herself a noted jazz pianist and harpist, says the woods were part of his father's creative process.
"I believe the solitude and the beauty of Long Island gave him something he had not had or experienced before," he says. "Clearly it affected the way he conceived.
Ravi Coltrane was born in 1965 and lived in the Dix Hills house until he was six.
"This is my sister's room over here. Michelle — this is her bedroom," he says. "This was the boys' room back here; this is the room I shared with my two brothers, John Jr. and Oran."'
But, Ravi Coltrane says, not all is as it was: The Coltrane Home in Dix Hills has fallen into disrepair in the 45 years after his father's death.
Preserving The Property
Many, including Ravi Coltrane, are trying to preserve the historic property. The driving force behind the effort is Steve Fulgoni, a music store owner, amateur saxophonist and a huge Coltrane fan. He first visited the house in 2004.
"I was looking around, and I looked in the corner, which I think was in this room, and all there was was one newspaper," Fulgoni says. "I picked up the newspaper, and I looked at the date, and the date of the newspaper was July 17, which was the anniversary of his death. And I said to myself, 'I need to do something.'"
That same year, he founded The Friends of the Coltrane Home. Fulgoni petitioned the town of Huntington, N.Y., to declare the site a historic landmark, and two years later, to purchase the property and designate it a public park.
But it's a long way from becoming a museum. The paint is peeling, the roof needs repair, the window frames are rotting and the gutters are dangling from the eaves.
Last year, the National Trust for Historic Preservation put the Coltrane Home on a list of the 11 most endangered historic sites in the United States.
Fulgoni says the site is important not only because Coltrane and his family lived here, but also because it's a symbol of the musician's triumphs over drugs and alcohol.
"In 1957, he secludes himself in his mother's house in Philadelphia, secludes himself for a week or two, and rids himself of all the demons that the jazz musicians went through at that time," Fulgoni says. "He says, 'If I am able to clean myself up, I will dedicate the rest of my life to God, to being a good person, to being on a mission to help other people.' And he did — it culminates here in 1964, in a room upstairs, he puts that to music."
That culmination was John Coltrane's four-part suite, A Love Supreme, which he composed in the summer of 1964. Widely regarded as one of the greatest jazz albums of all time, A Love Supreme sold more than a half-million copies by 1970, a number that eventually doubled.
'A Force For Good'
In the liner notes, Coltrane wrote that the record was a Psalm of Thanks to God for the spiritual awakening he experienced, and the privilege "to make others happy through music."
Coltrane described his philosophy in a 1966 interview in Japan.
"I believe that men are here to grow themselves into best good that they can be — at least, this is what I want to do," Coltrane says. "I am supposed to go to the best good that I can get to. And as I'm going there — becoming this — and when I become, if I ever become, this will just come out of the horn. Good can only bring good."
"He said himself, he wanted to be a force for good," says Ravi Coltrane. "It's like 'Wow, OK, how do you do that with this brass instrument with buttons on it?' He used sound to achieve those goals."
Ravi Coltrane is 46 years old now — six older than his father was when he died of liver cancer in 1967. Ravi lives in Brooklyn with his wife and two sons of his own. Like his father, he plays tenor and soprano saxophone, and has a new album, called Spirit Fiction.
He says he wants to preserve the Coltrane Home in Dix Hills as a symbol of what his parents stood for.
"This house for me, it's history. It's my own history, but it's also the great history of John and Alice Coltrane," he says. "If some day it can stand as a museum, or cultural center, that can continue to spread their message of creativity, and really truly embracing the inner voice, for the betterment of the exterior world. I would be thrilled if this house could some day be a monument for those things."
Tom Vitale @'npr'
Listen Now
Download
RSD guest mix - radioactive show, passionradiobristol.com (Sept 2010)
RADIOACTIVE SHOW every Wednesday 7-9pm passionradiobristol.com
DJ's on rotation - Crewz, Gemmy, Time & Sickman D, Interface & Central Spilz
this show aired on 1st Sept 2010
part 1
Synkro - Just Say
Code 071 - London Sumtin (Seven remix)
Seven - Just Wait
Phaeleh - Low
TWSV - Cold
Bunjy & Sam - Fire
Duffstep - Know You
Sivarider - Boom A Drop
Hatcha & Lost - Why So Serious
Doshy - Space Attack / Chip
part 2
SQ Sound - Love Is The Way ft Singer Blue
Albert - Can't Lie
The Split Brothers - King Me
Jack Sparrow - Red Sand
Superisk - Find Your Way (Mensah Remix)
Wartech & Ill Bill Batchelor - C**t Andromeda
Love Pressure - XI Remix
Vivex - Feel It
Vivex - Strategy
Benga - Assumptions
part 3
War 17b
MRed - Chase The Devil Riddim Retouch
War 17a
Kalbata ft Little John - Sugar Plum (RSD mix)
(?) - Too Late Vocal/Dub
TMSV - Cold (again)
Hypervisor - This World
Unknown - Golden Hen Refix
Ashburner - Soundboy
Goli & Ashburner - Levitate VIP
Joe - Untitled
Djunya - Full Circle
jason alexander (@IJasonAlexander)
This morning, I made a comment about how I do not understand people who support public ownership of assault style weapons like the AR-15 used in the Colorado massacre. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AR-15
That comment, has of course, inspired a lot of feedback. There have been many tweets of agreement and sympathy but many, many more that have been challenging at the least, hostile and vitriolic at the worst.
Clearly, the angry, threatened and threatening, hostile comments are coming from gun owners and gun advocates. Despite these massacres recurring and despite the 100,000 Americans that die every year due to domestic gun violence - these people see no value to even considering some kind of control as to what kinds of weapons are put in civilian hands.
Many of them cite patriotism as their reason - true patriots support the Constitution adamantly and wholly. Constitution says citizens have the right to bear arms in order to maintain organized militias. I'm no constitutional scholar so here it is from the document itself:
As passed by the Congress:
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
As ratified by the States and authenticated by Thomas Jefferson, Secretary of State:
"A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
So the patriots are correct, gun ownership is in the constitution - if you're in a well-regulated militia. Let's see what no less a statesman than Alexander Hamilton had to say about a militia:
"A tolerable expertness in military movements is a business that requires time and practice. It is not a day, or even a week, that will suffice for the attainment of it. To oblige the great body of the yeomanry, and of the other classes of the citizens, to be under arms for the purpose of going through military exercises and evolutions, as often as might be necessary to acquire the degree of perfection which would entitle them to the character of a well-regulated militia, would be a real grievance to the people, and a serious public inconvenience and loss."
Or from Merriam-Webster dictionary:
Definition of MILITIA
1
a : a part of the organized armed forces of a country liable to call only in emergency
b : a body of citizens organized for military service
2
: the whole body of able-bodied male citizens declared by law as being subject to call to military service
The advocates of guns who claim patriotism and the rights of the 2nd Amendment - are they in well-regulated militias? For the vast majority - the answer is no.
Then I get messages from seemingly decent and intelligent people who offer things like: @BrooklynAvi: Guns should only be banned if violent crimes committed with tomatoes means we should ban tomatoes. OR @nysportsguys1: Drunk drivers kill, should we ban fast cars?
I'm hoping that right after they hit send, they take a deep breath and realize that those arguments are completely specious. I believe tomatoes and cars have purposes other than killing. What purpose does an AR-15 serve to a sportsman that a more standard hunting rifle does not serve? Let's see - does it fire more rounds without reload? Yes. Does it fire farther and more accurately? Yes. Does it accommodate a more lethal payload? Yes. So basically, the purpose of an assault style weapon is to kill more stuff, more fully, faster and from further away. To achieve maximum lethality. Hardly the primary purpose of tomatoes and sports cars.
Then there are the tweets from the extreme right - these are the folk who believe our government has been corrupted and stolen and that the forces of evil are at play, planning to take over this nation and these folk are going to fight back and take a stand. And any moron like me who doesn't see it should...
a. be labeled a moron
b. shut the fuck up
c. be removed
And amazingly, I have some minor agreement with these folks. I believe there are evil forces at play in our government. But I call them corporatists. I call them absolutists. I call them the kind of ideologues from both sides, but mostly from the far right who swear allegiance to unelected officials that regardless of national need or global conditions, are never to levy a tax. That they are never to compromise or seek solutions with the other side. That are to obstruct every possible act of governance, even the ones they support or initiate. Whose political and social goal is to marginalize the other side, vilify and isolate them with the hope that they will surrender, go away or die out.
These people believe that the US government is eventually going to go street by street and enslave our citizens. Now as long as that is only happening to liberals, homosexuals and democrats - no problem. But if they try it with anyone else - it's going to be arms-ageddon and these committed, God-fearing, brave souls will then use their military-esque arsenal to show the forces of our corrupt government whats-what. These people think they meet the definition of a "militia". They don't. At least not the constitutional one. And, if it should actually come to such an unthinkable reality, these people believe they would win. That's why they have to "take our country back". From who? From anyone who doesn't think like them or see the world like them. They hold the only truth, everyone else is dangerous. Ever meet a terrorist that doesn't believe that? Just asking.
Then there are the folks who write that if everyone in Colorado had a weapon, this maniac would have been stopped. Perhaps. But I do believe that the element of surprise, tear gas and head to toe kevlar protection might have given him a distinct edge. Not only that, but a crowd of people firing away in a chaotic arena without training or planning - I tend to think that scenario could produce even more victims.
Lastly, there are these well-intended realists that say that people like this evil animal would get these weapons even if we regulated them. And they may be right. But he wouldn't have strolled down the road to Kmart and picked them up. Regulated, he would have had to go to illegal sources - sources that could possibly be traced, watched, overseen. Or he would have to go deeper online and those transactions could be monitored. "Hm, some guy in Aurora is buying guns, tons of ammo and kevlar - plus bomb-making ingredients and tear gas. Maybe we should check that out."
But that won't happen as long as all that activity is legal and unrestricted.
I have been reading on and off as advocates for these weapons make their excuses all day long. Guns don't kill - people do. Well if that's correct, I go with @BrooklynAvi, let them kill with tomatoes. Let them bring baseball bats, knives, even machetes --- a mob can deal with that.
There is no excuse for the propagation of these weapons. They are not guaranteed or protected by our constitution. If they were, then we could all run out and purchase a tank, a grenade launcher, a bazooka, a SCUD missile and a nuclear warhead. We could stockpile napalm and chemical weapons and bomb-making materials in our cellars under our guise of being a militia.
These weapons are military weapons. They belong in accountable hands, controlled hands and trained hands. They should not be in the hands of private citizens to be used against police, neighborhood intruders or people who don't agree with you. These are the weapons that maniacs acquire to wreak murder and mayhem on innocents. They are not the same as handguns to help homeowners protect themselves from intruders. They are not the same as hunting rifles or sporting rifles. These weapons are designed for harm and death on big scales.
SO WHY DO YOU CONTINUE TO SUPPORT THEM? WHY DO YOU NOT, AT LEAST, AGREE TO SIT WITH REASONABLE PEOPLE FROM BOTH SIDES AND ASK HARD QUESTIONS AND LOOK AT HARD STATISTICS AND POSSIBLY MAKE SOME COMPROMISES FOR THE GREATER GOOD? SO THAT MOTHERS AND FATHERS AND CHILDREN ARE NOT SLAUGHTERED QUITE SO EASILY BY THESE MONSTERS? HOW CAN IT HURT TO STOP DEFENDING THESE THINGS AND AT LEAST CONSIDER HOW WE CAN ALL WORK TO TRY TO PREVENT ANOTHER DAY LIKE YESTERDAY?
We will not prevent every tragedy. We cannot stop every maniac. But we certainly have done ourselves no good by allowing these particular weapons to be acquired freely by just about anyone.
I'll say it plainly - if someone wants these weapons, they intend to use them. And if they are willing to force others to "pry it from my cold, dead hand", then they are probably planning on using them on people.
So, sorry those of you who tell me I'm an actor, or a has-been or an idiot or a commie or a liberal and that I should shut up. You can not watch my stuff, you can unfollow and you can call me all the names you like. I may even share some of them with my global audience so everyone can get a little taste of who you are.
But this is not the time for reasonable people, on both sides of this issue, to be silent. We owe it to the people whose lives were ended and ruined yesterday to insist on a real discussion and hopefully on some real action.
In conclusion, whoever you are and wherever you stand on this issue, I hope you have the joy of family with you today. Hold onto them and love them as best you can. Tell them what they mean to you. Yesterday, a whole bunch of them went to the movies and tonight their families are without them. Every day is precious. Every life is precious. Take care. Be well. Be safe. God bless.
Jason Alexander
Sunday 22nd July 2012
Via
(Thanx Anne!)
Sunday 22 July 2012
Fox Ache!
We have to do something about gun
controls. Police license okay for hunting rifle or pistol for anyone
without crim or pscho record. No more
I agree, @rupertmurdoch. I look forward to your television network adopting your viewpoint on this.
A BAD move Mr. Drew (Updated)
Why is Plan B wearing a neo-Nazi t-shirt?
Update:
Plan B Apology For Skrewdriver T Shirt Misunderstanding
I honestly think Ben Drew is a truly genuine talent in a sea of mediocrity and his statement is plausible. However if I ever catch him wearing a Clapton tee!
Meanwhile...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
