Friday 10 September 2010

Traditional owners focus anger at Woodside

Kimberley traditional owners have come out swinging at Woodside, accusing the company of orchestrating the compulsory acquisition process triggered by Premier Colin Barnett.
Traditional Owner Negotiating Committee co-chair Frank Parriman, who had previously supported the bid to build a gas precinct at James Price Point, 60km north of Broome, said he was now reassessing his position.
"I believe a lot of this stuff was orchestrated by Woodside - my anger is at Woodside more than the Premier," he said. "They want this project and they're prepared to do anything to get it.
"But (Mr Barnett) should have had enough courage to stand up to Woodside and say you do the right thing by Aboriginal people and we'll be right.
"Instead, he's happy to knock down Aboriginal people - and he knows he's going to get public support, because it's easy to knock the old blackfella down.
"He's prepared to take land from us - he's not prepared to stand up to the company."
Woodside has said it is prepared to honour the terms of a $1.5bn benefits package it signed with the State Government and Kimberley Land Council in April last year.
But Mr Parriman said traditional owners, who met in Broome today, were "confused and very angry" about recent developments and it was "not about the money".
"It's about the social impacts, environmental impacts, impact on heritage and culture," he said. "They see this as the State stealing their country and that's what it actually amounts to.
"When we entered these negotiations, we did it on the basis of the benefits for the region and to create opportunity for Aboriginal people throughout the Kimberley.
"This situation threatens that … we don't want to leave anybody behind, we don't want to leave anybody worse off.
"The Jabirr Jabirr people are in a position now where if we walk away from it, nothing is going to change for Aboriginal people - if we stay with it, we don't get what we want."
Kimberley Land Council chief executive Wayne Bergmann called on the Premier to suspend the compulsory acquisition process and return to the negotiating table, warning history had shown when the Kimberley Aboriginal people banded together in a fight, they could "shake the ground".
He said the meeting was to ensure that traditional owners clearly understood their rights and the risks and consequences of proceeding.
"We're giving people advice about what are their rights in terms of objections, so they can make an informed decision about whether they continue to work with the State and Woodside or whether they sit back and oppose the project," he said.
"What fundamentally concerns us about compulsory acquisition is that it places traditional owners under enormous pressure. Ten days of negotiations between now and March would be bad faith on a project that's going to have 50 to 100 years impact on this region. It surely had to be an error … it is just so outrageous.
"This compulsory acquisition could well be the game changer, where Aboriginal people will not participate any further. If traditional owners instruct us to take a position for or against … that's what the KLC would mobilise its resources to do."
Mr Barnett said the decision to commence the compulsory acquisition process was necessary as the Kimberley Land Council and native title claimants had been unable to finalise an Indigenous Land Use Agreement despite three time extensions and $15.6 million in funding.
"The State Government would prefer to sign an ILUA based on consent, and I continue to encourage claimants to resolve the issues within their groups," he said.
A Woodside spokesman said the company accepted the State's rationale for instigating the process.
"Although the compulsory acquisition process has been started, there is still an opportunity for the parties to reach a negotiated outcome without compulsory acquisition running its full course," he said.
He said the support of traditional owners was "very important to Woodside".
"We want to work closely with traditional owners to maintain that support and ensure that the Browse project brings real and lasting benefits to Kimberley Aboriginal people," he said.

Thursday 9 September 2010

I agree!

ian katz iankatz1000 MP Tom Watson says Rupert Murdoch should be called before MP's inquiry into phone-hacking by News of the World

News Corp. Is Freaking Out

Raime - We Must Hunt Under The Wreckage Of Many Systems

   

US soldiers 'killed Afghan civilians for sport and collected fingers as trophies'

Lady Gaga's meat bikini

Burial/Kode9 Mix for final Mary Anne Hobbs show on Radio 1


Burial and Hyperdub mastermind Kode9 collaborated on this mix for Mary Anne Hobbs‘ amazing send off show on BBC Radio 1, which aired earlier this evening. No tracklist yet, but the whole mix emitted a ghostly, warped vibe that felt like listening to a distant pirate radio broadcast. Brilliant and haunting as usual from these two:
Tracklist:
01. Speedy J – Tesla
02. Zomby – Natalia’s Song
03. Brandy – Never Say Never (El-B version 1)
04. Brandy – Never Say Never (El-B version 2)
05. Brandy – Angel (X-Men vocal mix)
06. Laurie Spiegel – Voices Within – A Requiem
07. Alena – Turn It Around (Hard House Bantons Mandy Mix)
08. Cooly G – Him Da Biz
09. Theo Parrish – Soul Control feat. Alena Waters
10. KMFH aka Kyle Hall – Girl U So Strong (Wild Oats)
11. Terror Danjah – S.O.S.
12. Darkstar – 2 Chords
13. Prince – Condition of the Heart
14. Erykah Badu – Telephone
15. Foul Play – Being With U Rmx
16. A Guy called Gerald – Silent Cry 
@'Gorilla VS Bear'

HA!

Armando Iannucci Aiannucci Interesting statistic. There are now more News of The World hidden cameras in Britain than there are prostitutes.

Fugn idiots!



Dubblestandart w/ David Lynch & Lee Scratch Perry - Chrome Optimism (Kush Arora RMX)

   

Richard Devine - Hydrophone/Lav Recording of 1000 Maggots in sticky wet mud

   

Smoking # 81

Wall Street Journal takes on New York Times 華爾街日報單挑紐約時報

Phone hacking was rife at News of the World, claims new witness

Dirty Tricks Dept. # ???

Republican Runs Street People on Green Ticket

Hallucinations attributed to djinns

Jac Holzman on the future of music

Jac Holzman
The Internet is a killer of art--or at least that's how a couple of former rock 'n' roll gods see it.
John Mellencamp, known for such '80s hits as "Jack and Diane" and "Hurts So Good," last week said the Web is the most dangerous creation since the atomic bomb. Stevie Nicks, the Fleetwood Mac songstress, concluded in an interview this week that the "Internet has destroyed rock."
Jac Holzman, the man who discovered The Doors, founded Elektra Records, and nudged the big recording companies into adopting the compact disc, considers the Web and says: "I think the music industry has a bright future."
Wow, that's quite a contrast in views. The difference is Holzman has witnessed most of the industry-shaking technologies during his six decades in the music business--and he's not panicking.
This year, the 79-year-old celebrates Elektra's 60th anniversary, and at a life stage when Holzman's biggest trouble might be choosing the right 9-iron, he's helping to search for answers to the music industry's burning digital questions. He has said in the past that there were those in the record business who didn't think he was relevant any longer, but Holzman is back in the thick of it. Warner Music Group CEO Edgar Bronfman Jr. sought him out, hired him as a senior adviser, and sees value in the context Holzman can provide.
"I love the way Jac approaches the intersection of music and technology--through the lens of opportunity," Bronfman said.
At spotting opportunities, Holzman has a notable record. As a 19-year-old, Holzman started Elektra with $300 he received at his bar mitzvah. The label would later go to sign such acts as Queen, Judy Collins, The Stooges, and Jim Morrison. After Holzman sold Electra to Warner Communication (a forerunner of Warner Music Group and Warner Bros. Pictures), he became WCI's chief technology officer. In that role, he helped oversee some of the company's film and TV ventures.

"We met right around the time when Napster came together, and I said 'There are opportunities and there are potholes. How are you preparing for a digital future?' He said to me, 'Jac, I just want it to go away'."
--Jac Holzman
When Jack Valenti, the chief of the Motion Picture Association of America, was trying to kill video recorders and comparing them to the Boston Strangler, Holzman was steering WCI into the home-video market. With cable TV he recognized its potential early and contributed to the development of pay-per-view programming.
In music, Holzman saw the rise of the LP, 8-track tape, DAT, compact disc, MP3, and BitTorrent. After all that, new technologies don't spook him. On the contrary, he says many of these technologies helped make a lot of artists and industry people rich. When it comes to the Internet and digital distribution, Holzman is confident music labels can capitalize on them too. He says they really don't have a choice.
"I was having lunch with a very dear friend of mine [in the record business] sometime around 2000," Holzman said during an interview this week with CNET. "We met right around the time when Napster came together, and I said 'There are opportunities and there are potholes. How are you preparing for a digital future?' He said to me, 'Jac, I just want it to go away.' Well, you can't continue that conversation."
It's hard to imagine that anybody would want to put Holzman out to pasture. At a time when the industry is trying to make sense of the Internet, wouldn't it make sense to have people around who have a history at capitalizing on technological advances?
Holzman recounts the meeting where he introduced the compact disc to some of the label chiefs, including Ahmet Ertegun, the founder of Atlantic Records, and Mo Ostin, who headed Warner Bros. Records. Holzman said that what eventually appealed most to some of the leaders was the money they could earn by reselling their catalogs in the new format. While the CD proved to be a financial boon, Holzman recognized much later that by selling the discs to the public, the record labels were essentially placing digital-master recordings into every home.
That proved to be a liability when CD burners arrived on the scene and enabled people to make high-quality, unauthorized copies to share with each other via the Web.
"I didn't see that coming," Holzman said mournfully. "I knew that CD burners were out there, but when companies began putting them in computers...that surprised me."
On Napster
If Holzman's advice to Bronfman sounds anything like the opinions he offered during our interview, here's what he might be whispering into the CEO's ear.
Holzman suggested that the big labels goofed when they sued Napster out of existence. At that point, the rise of the CD had left the industry without an effective way to sell individual songs. Before the CD, the 45-rpm vinyl disc was the perfect singles vehicle. The costs of manufacturing CDs, however, made that format more suited to selling full albums, according to Holzman.
"With Napster, it would have been easy to proliferate singles," Holzman said. "You would have had no manufacturing costs. You would still have the value of the single as a calling card for albums and you could have sold [songs] for something like 79 cents, made it affordable. You would have had ability to count because all of the transactions went through a central server at Napster, unlike peer-to-peer where you bypassed servers. Now, would P2P still have happened? Yes it would. But we would have established a principle of being paid for digital music."
On fair use
Holzman agrees with some of the arguments made by Lawrence Lessig, the academic who has called for making copyright and trademark laws less restrictive.
"I think Lessig has some good ideas," Holzman said. "We have to be free enough with our music to permit people to adapt it for their own purposes and to create new works out of the building blocks of our music. I know that will drive most of my fellow record company people up the wall."
On ISPs
He said he thinks that the lawsuits filed against accused illegal file sharers by the Recording Industry Association of America, the trade group representing the four largest music labels, was a mistake. He also believes, however, that artists and record companies deserve to be compensated.
"I think we need to be paid for our music," Holzman said. "I think we are entitled to something from the ISPs. They have been getting a free ride on our music for a long time."
If some former marquee acts are wringing their hands about the future of the music sector, Holzman said he's encouraged by signs that the top labels are beginning to get their digital feet under them.
"I don't think anybody is afraid anymore," Holzman said. "I'm looking at all the labels, and I know them all and I've sat down with all their digital guys. Everybody is embracing digital technology, but they're just trying to figure out how to make it work for them."
 Greg Sandoval @'cnet'

Covert Operations

Mexico rejects Clinton drug crime 'insurgency' analogy

Scientists identify moves that make men irresistible on the dancefloor

 The enduring mystery of why men rarely flatter themselves when they take to the dancefloor may finally have been solved. A team of psychologists used video footage of men strutting their stuff to pinpoint the killer moves that separate good dancers from bad. Men who were judged to be good dancers had a varied repertoire and more moves that involved tilting and twisting the torso and neck.
But the majority of men displayed highly repetitive moves that used their arms and legs, but not the rest of their bodies.
"It's rare that someone is described as a good dancer if they are flinging their arms about but not much else," said Nick Neave, a psychologist at the University of Northumbria, who led the study.
"Think about a head banger. Their head movement has a large amplitude, but it's not changing direction or showing any kind of variability. That's a bad dancer. Or someone who is just twisting and turning left and right? That's a bad dancer too."
While features such as body shape and facial symmetry are well known indicators of healthy development, a person's dance moves may send out more subtle clues about their potential as a mate, Neave said.
Neave's team recruited 19 male volunteers aged between 18 and 35 and asked them to dance to a simple drum beat in front of a video camera for 30 seconds. To capture the dance moves, 38 infra-red reflectors were attached to their clothing. These produce bright spots that allow the movement of every limb and joint to be tracked and studied in detail.
The researchers used software to transfer each man's dance routine to an avatar on a computer screen. This ensured that the judges ranked the dancers according to their moves and not their height, looks or other physical features.
The dancers were judged by 37 straight women, also aged 18 to 35, who watched the avatar perform 15 seconds of each man's routine before ranking them on a scale of one to seven, where one was very bad dancing.
"The head, neck and upper body come out as the key features that are important for good dancing and that surprised us," said Neave, whose study is published in the journal Biology Letters. "When you see brilliant dancers, you'll see their bodies, heads and necks are all doing ever so slightly different things in time to the music."
Will Brown, a psychologist at the University of East London, said more work was needed to disentangle why dancing is attractive and its biological significance.
"When you have so much movement data from a relatively small sample of dancers, you might get chance associations between certain moves and dance attractiveness," he said.
"Flexing the trunk while dancing may be attractive, but we need to show it is indicative of a better quality male using an independent measure of biological quality."
Neave said his group is working through the results of blood tests on the men, which appear to show that the better dancers are healthier.
Ian Sample @'The Guardian'

Mothership/Land

<a href="http://freshdaily.bandcamp.com/album/mothership-land">The Next Best by Fresh Daily</a>

This Sucks


Meet Pastor Terry Jones of the Dove World Outreach Center, the 50-member church in Gainesville, Florida. Gainesville is where I live. This hate monger has turned our wonderful community into a lightning rod for hate and ignorance. Saying his church has 50 members is a stretch as he's lost some in the past weeks. On top of that, he has 9 kids so his family actually makes up 20% or more of the congregation. There happens to be a home football game of 90K fans this Saturday, 9/11/10. The FBI, Homeland Security are in town, and all local law enforcement are on super high alert. We have been informed by Homeland Security that we will not be reimbursed for the exorbitant costs of all this extra security, so our already overstretched local resources will be put over the limit all in the name of his selfish hatred for Islam. On top of all that, the image of our wonderful community will be forever tarnished.
Since the start of this, I've heard people say, "He should be ignored." However, stories like this are like crack for the media, and sure enough, the story is now international. The media satellite trucks outside this church now outnumber the vehicles of its congregation. It sucks to say Gainesville has fallen victim to fear and loathing. 
Read more 
@'The Gainesville Sun'

Mark Stewart on The Pop Group reunion

Mark’s a giant of a man. He’s one of those guys who has to stoop to get in rooms. He looks - to borrow his favourite word - like a clash of a 50s matinee idol, Reg Presley of The Troggs and an Easter Island Statue come angrily to life. His head’s velocity is too fast for anyone currently trapped in his orbit. I see Jim Sclavunous (Bad Seeds/Grinderman/occasional Quietus writer) afterwards and say that ideally I’d like to interview Stewart again because even though I liked him, maybe I'd caught him on a particularly manic day. Spending two hours with him was a bit like spending 20 hours trapped on a passenger jet that's full of children and constantly threatening to fall out of the sky. Jim smiles indulgently and says that he's always out there: "I've known Mark for years and he's always been far out on some distant cosmic plain that makes him hard to reach sometimes."
During the interview in The Griffin on Leonard Street, I feel like his brain is skimming on far ahead like a stone across a pond surface. I ask one thing and he answers some other question that I’ve not even dreamed up yet. He's like a chess grandmaster who has malfunctioned and found himself suddenly only able to play the moves that are the furthest ahead - ten steps into the future. These moves may make sense to him but don't always to those round him. There is much bright and probably brilliant talk occluded into partial uselessness by this. He reacts to everything around him. His face darts about changing expression constantly. He isn’t pulling focus and he’s omni-intent on the interview, my beard, the barwoman, his friends Andy Fraser of Some Friendly and Paul Smith of Blast First sat at the bar, the cold wave compilation being played on the stereo, his notes that he has written onto a sheet of paper in front of him, something else that he can see over my shoulder. He sneers loudly at nearly everything I say in about an hour and a half which can, and does, get slightly grating. Even if I had turned up totally unprepared, which I haven't, I still would have hit the mark with at least a third of the questions. He’s a nice guy though and an energizing presence. It’s sad he comes into this naturally presuming I’m on the opposite side to him. Part of him still acts as if it’s 1980 and the guy from the NME is here to stitch him up. In fact he constantly refers to me as being from the weekly (which I do write for) but he doesn’t hear when I tell him that the piece is for a more humble institution.
He admits himself that he's frozen in time in some ways: "I haven't changed since I was 14."...
Continue reading
John Doran @'The Quietus'

A virtual counter-revolution

The first internet boom, a decade and a half ago, resembled a religious movement. Omnipresent cyber-gurus, often framed by colourful PowerPoint presentations reminiscent of stained glass, prophesied a digital paradise in which not only would commerce be frictionless and growth exponential, but democracy would be direct and the nation-state would no longer exist. One, John-Perry Barlow, even penned “A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace”.
Even though all this sounded Utopian when it was preached, it reflected online reality pretty accurately. The internet was a wide-open space, a new frontier. For the first time, anyone could communicate electronically with anyone else—globally and essentially free of charge. Anyone was able to create a website or an online shop, which could be reached from anywhere in the world using a simple piece of software called a browser, without asking anyone else for permission. The control of information, opinion and commerce by governments—or big companies, for that matter—indeed appeared to be a thing of the past. “You have no sovereignty where we gather,” Mr Barlow wrote.
The lofty discourse on “cyberspace” has long changed. Even the term now sounds passé. Today another overused celestial metaphor holds sway: the “cloud” is code for all kinds of digital services generated in warehouses packed with computers, called data centres, and distributed over the internet. Most of the talk, though, concerns more earthly matters: privacy, antitrust, Google’s woes in China, mobile applications, green information technology (IT). Only Apple’s latest iSomethings seem to inspire religious fervour, as they did again this week.
Again, this is a fair reflection of what is happening on the internet. Fifteen years after its first manifestation as a global, unifying network, it has entered its second phase: it appears to be balkanising, torn apart by three separate, but related forces...
Continue reading

Wednesday 8 September 2010

What a surprise...

Forget What You Know About Good Study Habits

Key witness will testify on News of the World phone hacking

 

Kidnapped Reporter Tweets Secretly From Afghan Captivity

Harmony Korine - Act da Fool

John Pilger:

Abuse in the Name of Treatment - Drug Detention Centers in Asia


According to estimations, there are hundreds of thousands of people kept in compulsory drug detention centers in Vietnam, China, Thailand and Laos. It is easy to get in to one of these centers. Some people enter voluntarily in the hope of kicking their drug habit, others are sent there by their families who pay for their “treatment”; but in some cities, it often happens that the military police just collect street children, drug users, sex workers and other groups on the street considered “deviant” by the authorities and detains them in a camp for years, without any due process or right of appeal. It’s easy to get in – but it’s hard to get out. Detainees are often forced to work for free, starved, beaten, tortured and raped – but they don’t get any treatment or rehabilitation. If they finally leave the camps, they feel more disintegrated from society than at any time before. The vast majority of detainees who leave the camps start to use drugs again or engage in other illegal activities. The governments of Laos, Cambodia and Thailand received millions of dollars from Western governments to build camps to treat drug addicts. Tax payers in donor countries had no idea what is happening in these camps before Human Rights Watch documented the widespread human rights abuses. One of the centers – Koh Kor – was closed thanks to human rights advocacy but there are still too many in operation. HCLU, along with international organizations such as UNAIDS or UNODC, is calling for the closure of these camps. We hope after watching our new movie more people will join us and put pressure on these governments to stop the abuse in the name of drug treatment.
If you want to learn more read the related reports of Human Rights Watch:

SFA!!!

The Horror of Scotland 2 Liechtenstein 1

Bloody hell!!!

♪♫ Trentemøller - Even Though You're With Another Girl

HA!

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

12 Inches



via Blogrebellen