Fools
1 hour ago
Monday, 23 January 2012
Another one bites the dust:
'UploadBox file hosting service is no longer available. All files will be deleted on January 30th. Feel free to download the files you store with UploadBox until this date.'
Can interviewed about Tago Mago (1972)
WXFM in Chicago from 1969-1977.
Download
HERE
Can’s Crowning Krautrock Moment
Increased risk of Parkinson’s disease in individuals hospitalized with conditions related to the use of methamphetamine or other amphetamine-type drugs
(PDF)(Thanx Keith!)
mattblaze matt blaze
Belief that "content" is something created exclusively by "professionals" is what enables things like #SOPA to get the traction they do.
mattblaze matt blaze
I once asked a group of incoming undergrads how many were "content creators". Almost none. Yet almost all had FB pages, etc.
Collateral damage in the copyright wars
In the blue corner we have the US criminal justice system.
On Thursday, acting on requests from a US federal prosecutor, New Zealand police arrested Kim Dotcom, founder of Hong Kong-based Megaupload Limited, and three other company executives. The company's internet domains were seized and servers shut down. Authorities in Hong Kong froze $39 million in assets.
Megaupload ran a network of internet services, the best-known of which was file hosting site Megaupload.com. Users could upload files for others to download, either anonymously or as registered users with either a free or paid account.
"File sharing", in other words, but I'm avoiding that term because the copyright industries are keen to equate the noble word "sharing" with "stealing". Let's not encourage that fraud.
The feds claim Megaupload's customers were illegally distributing copyrighted material, generating $175 million as proceeds of that crime, and costing copyright owners $500 million in lost revenue.
In the red corner we have Anonymous.
Well, we have a random and unknown collection of people who claim that they support the worldview that is espoused by people who say they espouse the worldview labelled Anonymous. Could be anyone. But for the purposes of lazy reportage we'll just say "Anonymous said" and "Anonymous hacked", m'kay?
Anonymous claims (see previous paragraph) to have conducted "the single largest Internet attack in its history", though no numbers were given.
As usual, it was a distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack that flooded a bunch of websites off the grid. As usual, it was a scattergun selection, either "the law" or "the evil industry" or the like, ranging from the US Department of Justice and the FBI, to the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) and its chief executive Chris Dodd, Warner Music Group and so on.
In a way, this story is nothing new. Law enforcement agencies took action against an alleged copyright-infringing operation, and in retaliation there was a DDoS of various big-name sites. Yawn.
But in a week when the blackout protest of some of the world's most popular websites - as well as an estimated 75,000 to 115,000 others - drew attention to the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and Protect IP Act (PIPA), thinking people's antennas are more finely attuned to the issues.
It's easy to point to Megaupload and say that something dodgy must have been going on. At least some of the more than 180 million registered users are bound to have been distributing copyright material. With those numbers, how could it be otherwise?
And that's without even exploring the site and seeing how easy it was to find the good stuff.
The FBI goes further, alleging that "the conspiracy" had set up their business model specifically to encourage users to upload popular copyrighted material for others to download.
"The indictment alleges that the site was structured to discourage the vast majority of its users from using Megaupload for long-term or personal storage by automatically deleting content that was not regularly downloaded," said the FBI's media release.
"In addition, by actively supporting the use of third-party linking sites to publicise infringing content, the conspirators did not need to publicise such content on the Megaupload site [itself]."
Other techniques were allegedly used to conceal copyright infringement, or convey the impression that Megaupload was acting to curb such activity when it wasn't.
None of this has yet been proven in court. Yet the sites have been shut down. Megaupload users who were going about their perfectly legitimate business have lost their subscription fees. Families can no longer exchange their home movies. Musicians, filmmakers and software developers can no longer share the files they were working on.
The FBI's timing is remarkably ham-fisted. This is precisely the kind of guilt-by-allegation and collateral damage that the anti-SOPA protestors have been banging on about. And if current laws make it difficult for American authorities to reach out beyond US shores to get the bad guys, um, so what just happened? Why are SOPA and PIPA needed, exactly?
What the FBI has just shown is that they'll pursue the movie, TV, book and music industries' allegations and shut down devices on the internet if it's believed - not proven - that they contain files that someone, somewhere, has an interest in. The device's owners or anyone else with an interest in what else is happening on that device won't be notified or, indeed, worried about at all.
And by "devices" I mean any of the 5 billion internet-connected computers, from a major company's cloud storage service to your businesses' file server, to the shared hosting server where its website lives, to your home media server, to the laptop on your desk, to the smartphone in your pocket.
Warner Music Group's revenue might be protected, but what about the band that just lost access to the master file for its new album? There goes next month's rent. What about your sales team's shared prospect list? There goes next quarter's revenue. Oops.
It's certainly put a dent in IT industry's call to "put it in the cloud".
It's certainly put a big red "must find out more" tag next to open source privacy-enhancing projects like the FreedomBox.
But Anonymous has been (see earlier paragraph) clueless too.
As Chenda Ngak wrote for CBS News, any goodwill in Washington that the anti-SOPA blackout generated has just been wiped out.
"The effort put forth by millions of activists on Wednesday wasn't about promoting piracy. It was about asking congress to write a better bill to protect intellectual property. Anonymous' latest hacking spree changed the conversation," he wrote.
"Thanks a lot, Anonymous. This is why we can't have nice things."
Last week The Greens' Senator Scott Ludlam pointed out that here in Australia, the Government's internet copyright discussions only involve the middle men: the distributors and the internet service providers.
"They appear to have left out the creative people who make the content and the audience... The people who actually matter in that debate aren't in the room," he told the Linux.conf.au 2012 conference in Ballarat.
"We should be in that room, in the copyright debate. Otherwise, we are going to get some kind of dumbed-down Australian-flavoured SOPA. Twelve months after it resolves itself in the United States, it'll pop up here, you can absolutely guarantee it."
But if Anonymous continues to behaves like it does, or if lobby groups like the Pirate Party don't disassociate themselves from this rabble, the audience will never be in that room.
Stilgherrian @'ABC'
Investigate Chris Dodd and the MPAA for bribery after he publicly admited to bribing politicans to pass legislation
Recently on FOX News former Senator Chris Dodd said (as quoted on news site TechDirt), "Those who count on quote 'Hollywood' for support need to understand that this industry is watching very carefully who's going to stand up for them when their job is at stake. Don't ask me to write a check for you when you think your job is at risk and then don't pay any attention to me when my job is at stake," This is an open admission of bribery and a threat designed to provoke a specific policy goal. This is a brazen flouting of the "above the law" status people of Dodd's position and wealth enjoy.
We demand justice. Investigate this blatant bribery and indict every person, especially government officials and lawmakers, who is involved.
HERE
We demand justice. Investigate this blatant bribery and indict every person, especially government officials and lawmakers, who is involved.
HERE
MPAA Directly & Publicly Threatens Politicians Who Aren't Corrupt Enough To Stay Bought
Chris Dodd warns of Hollywood backlash against Obama over anti-piracy bill
JackofKent David Allen Green
It would be far better if senior media executives cared more about privacy and less about piracy.
JackofKent David Allen Green
Copyright infringement is not theft. It is a civil wrong and so should be avoided, but it is not by itself a crime.
Unfugnbelievable!!!
Group participation: what's wrong with this picture?
I ordered some video-editing software from Hitfilm in the UK which also comes with some instructional videos. So a few days later I get a call from FedEx saying that the DVDs were being held at U.S. Customs until I filled out a Video Declaration Form, which she said was now standard practice. Now, I'd never heard of this before, so I called back to ensure that this was indeed FedEx and not someone phishing for information. Had them email me the form.
This is what the form said: "I/we declare the the films/videos contain no obscene or immoral matter, nor any matter advocating or urging treason or insurrection against the United States, nor any threat to take the life of or inflict bodily harm upon any person in the United States."
Now, the first clause I can kinda see, though "immoral" is weird and there's no standard definition of obscenity in the US, but let that go...what made my eyebrows go up my forehead and down the other side was clause two. So I called back the nice lady at FedEx -- who was only following instructions given to her by Customs -- and asked what this was all about.
Apparently -- and this is only her understanding of the situation -- this is a new thing being done by Customs and Homeland Security with FedEx, UPS, and other carriers to make sure that films and videos with ideas or stories that were at odds with the United States Government didn't get into the country, as it was a form of terrorism (as further elaborated upon in the third and final clause.) She added that some DVDs showing Occupy events in London and elsewhere had gotten bounced because of the concern that these were being used to coordinate activities here (as if with the internet people actually need physical DVDs for that sort of thing but that's neither here nor there).
Under this new stipulation, if V for Vendetta had, for instance, been produced in the UK (instead of just filmed there), importing it into the US would be considered subject matter "advocating or urging treason or insurrection." And if you lied about it on the form, you could be held liable for this.
So there are now very literally guardians at the gate ensuring that the wrong sorts of ideas, movies or DVDs are not allowed into the country without investigation and/or prosecution. And most pernicious of all, they don't actually define what they mean by advocating treason or insurrection, any more than they define what "immoral" means, it's whatever they decide it means, so you could be breaking the law without knowing you're doing it, until they decide you're doing it.
Thoughts?
Via
(Thanx Sander!)
I ordered some video-editing software from Hitfilm in the UK which also comes with some instructional videos. So a few days later I get a call from FedEx saying that the DVDs were being held at U.S. Customs until I filled out a Video Declaration Form, which she said was now standard practice. Now, I'd never heard of this before, so I called back to ensure that this was indeed FedEx and not someone phishing for information. Had them email me the form.
This is what the form said: "I/we declare the the films/videos contain no obscene or immoral matter, nor any matter advocating or urging treason or insurrection against the United States, nor any threat to take the life of or inflict bodily harm upon any person in the United States."
Now, the first clause I can kinda see, though "immoral" is weird and there's no standard definition of obscenity in the US, but let that go...what made my eyebrows go up my forehead and down the other side was clause two. So I called back the nice lady at FedEx -- who was only following instructions given to her by Customs -- and asked what this was all about.
Apparently -- and this is only her understanding of the situation -- this is a new thing being done by Customs and Homeland Security with FedEx, UPS, and other carriers to make sure that films and videos with ideas or stories that were at odds with the United States Government didn't get into the country, as it was a form of terrorism (as further elaborated upon in the third and final clause.) She added that some DVDs showing Occupy events in London and elsewhere had gotten bounced because of the concern that these were being used to coordinate activities here (as if with the internet people actually need physical DVDs for that sort of thing but that's neither here nor there).
Under this new stipulation, if V for Vendetta had, for instance, been produced in the UK (instead of just filmed there), importing it into the US would be considered subject matter "advocating or urging treason or insurrection." And if you lied about it on the form, you could be held liable for this.
So there are now very literally guardians at the gate ensuring that the wrong sorts of ideas, movies or DVDs are not allowed into the country without investigation and/or prosecution. And most pernicious of all, they don't actually define what they mean by advocating treason or insurrection, any more than they define what "immoral" means, it's whatever they decide it means, so you could be breaking the law without knowing you're doing it, until they decide you're doing it.
Thoughts?
Via
(Thanx Sander!)
R.I.P. FileSonic & Uploaded.to
Wow. Do you think anyone else will fold in light of the ongoing witch hunt? And could a major player like Mediafire go under?
Via
Filesonic Kills File-Sharing Service After MegaUpload Arrests
Luc Sante: The Mother Courage of Rock
Patti Smith holding the photographer Judy Linn’s Super 8 Bolex camera at Linn’s apartment in Brooklyn, early 1970s; from Linn’s recent book of photographs, Patti Smith 1969–1976
I first heard of Patti Smith in 1971, when I was seventeen. The occasion was an unsigned half-column item in the New York Flyer, a short-lived local supplement to Rolling Stone, marking the single performance of Cowboy Mouth, a play she cowrote and costarred in with Sam Shepard, and it was possibly her first appearance in the press. What caught my eye and made me save the clipping—besides the accompanying photo of her in a striped jersey, looking vulnerable—was her boast, “I’m one of the best poets in rock and roll.” At the time, I didn’t just think I was the best poet in rock and roll; I thought I was the only one, for all that my practice consisted solely of playing “Sister Ray” by the Velvet Underground very loud on the stereo and filling notebook pages with drivel that naturally fell into the song’s meter. (I later discovered that I was just one of hundreds, maybe thousands, of teenagers around the world doing essentially the same thing.)Very soon I began seeing her byline in the rock papers, the major intellectual conduits of youth at that time. Her contributions were not ordinary. She reviewed a Lotte Lenya anthology for Rolling Stone (“[She] lays the queen’s cards on the table and plays them with kisses and spit and a ribbon round her throat”). She wrote a half-page letter to the editors of Crawdaddy contrasting that magazine’s praise for assorted mediocrities with the true neglected stars out in the world:
Best of everything there wasCreem devoted four pages to a portfolio of her poems (“Christ died for somebodies sins/but not mine/melting in a pot of thieves/wild card up the sleeve/thick heart of stone/my sins my own…”—if this sounds familiar, you expect the next line to be “they belong to me,” but it’s not there yet).
and everything there is to come
is often undocumented.
Lost in the cosmos of time.
On the subway I saw the most beautiful girl.
In an unknown pool hall I saw the greatest shot in history.
A nameless blonde boy in a mohair sweater.
A drawing in a Paris alleyway. Second only to Dubuffet.
Then in November 1973, a small ad in The Village Voice announced that she would be performing at Le Jardin, a gay disco in the roof garden of the Hotel Diplomat on West 43rd Street, in honor of “the first true poet and seer,” Arthur Rimbaud. Accompanied on guitar by Lenny Kaye, a rock critic familiar from his job behind the cash register at Village Oldies on Bleecker Street, she read and talk-sang: Kurt Weill’s “Speak Low,” Hank Ballard’s “Annie Had a Baby,” a version of Édith Piaf’s “Mon vieux Lucien,” and twenty-two more poems, four of them about Rimbaud. She was skinny, quick-witted, disarmingly unprofessional, alternating between stand-up patter, bardic intonations, and the hypnotic emotional sway of a chanteuse, and she was sexy in an androgynous way I hadn’t encountered before. The elements cohered convincingly; she seemed both entirely new and somehow long-anticipated. For me at nineteen, the show was an epiphany...
MORE
ioerror Jacob Appelbaum
The number of people in Australia with iPhone battery problems only after being physically near me is absolutely stunning.
Hmmm...
rupertmurdoch Rupert Murdoch
Copyright piracy. Everyone now agrees is stealing and wrong. So why all the hysteria? Why not discuss and settle on cure?
龍年
May all you and your family have good health 身體健康, good wealth 財源廣進, and all your wishes come true 心想事成 for coming New Year!
Sunday, 22 January 2012
♪♫ Viva Vox Choir - The Prodigy Mix (a cappella)
The Prodigy Mix (Out of Space, No Good, Smack My Bitch Up, Omen, Breathe, Firestarter originally performed by The Prodigy), performed by Viva Vox choir from Serbia, Belgrade, Zemun.
Live a cappella performance at Sava Centar, December 2011.
arr. Boris Balunović
conductor: Jasmina Lorin
via
The Story of Rough Trade (BBC Documentary)
The Rough Trade story begins more than thirty years ago on 20th February 1976. Britain was in the grip of an IRA bombing campaign; a future prime minister was beginning to make her mark on a middle England in which punk was yet to run amok; and a young Cambridge graduate called Geoff Travis opened a new shop at 202 Kensington Park Road, just off Ladbroke Grove in west London. The Rough Trade shop sold obscure and challenging records by bands like American art-rockers Pere Ubu, offering an alternative to the middle-of-the-road rock music that dominated the music business.
In January 1977, when a record by Manchester punk band Buzzcocks appeared in the shop, Rough Trade found itself in the right place at the right time to make an impact far beyond that of a neighbourhood music store. When Spiral Scratch was released in 1977, the idea of putting out a single without the support of an established record company was incredible. But Rough Trade was to become the headquarters of a revolt against this corporate monopoly – it was stocking records by bands inspired by the idea that they could do it themselves.
But selling a few independent records over the counter was not going to change the world. Early independent labels had to hand over their distribution to the likes of EMI or CBS. But one man at Rough Trade challenged that monopoly. Richard Scott joined Rough Trade in 1977 and became the architect of a grand scheme that was nothing short of revolutionary: independent nationwide distribution.
The shop could now offer experimental musicians the chance to sell records nationwide and so it was inevitable that Rough Trade became a record label in its own right. In 1978 the Rough Trade label was born and by the end of the year it had released a dozen singles by an eclectic mix of post-punk artists and become not just an alternative ideological force, but genuine competitors in the commercial music world.
via
Why?
Previously...
Obama didn't exactly defend Netanyahu, either.
"You're fed up with him, but I have to deal with him even more often than you," Obama replied, according to wire service reports.
Obama didn't exactly defend Netanyahu, either.
"You're fed up with him, but I have to deal with him even more often than you," Obama replied, according to wire service reports.
Kevin Saunderson - In The House Inspirations Mix
Tracklist:
01. Chaka Khan & Rufus - Ain't Nobody
02. Cerrone - Supernature
03. Stephanie Mills - Put Your Body in It
04. Evelyn "Champagne" King - Shame
05. Kraftwerk - Computer World
06. Cybotron - Alleys of Your Mind
07. Hashim - Al-Naafyish (The Soul)
09. Cybotron - Cosmic Cars
10. Cameo - Shake Your Pants
11. New Order - Blue Monday
Via
01. Chaka Khan & Rufus - Ain't Nobody
02. Cerrone - Supernature
03. Stephanie Mills - Put Your Body in It
04. Evelyn "Champagne" King - Shame
05. Kraftwerk - Computer World
06. Cybotron - Alleys of Your Mind
07. Hashim - Al-Naafyish (The Soul)
09. Cybotron - Cosmic Cars
10. Cameo - Shake Your Pants
11. New Order - Blue Monday
Via
Jah Wobble / Influences / Work Mix
I pulled out all the music that Wobble mentions in his autobiography and stitched it together. I wanted to see/hear it these influences made themselves apparent in his work. The rebel music of The Dublineers, El Chocolate and Marley. The dread of Big Youth, Augustus Pablo and John Martyn’s Compass Point LP. Miles’ claustrophobia, and the funk of The Isleys and Jimmy Castor (RIP). The heart and soul of Om Kalsoum. The African rhythms of King Sunny Ade and Salif Keita. And the bass-lines of The O’Jays, Larry Graham, Laswell, and Cecil McBee. I was quite surprised by the result, and this is likely a reflection of the honesty of the man...
HERE
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
