Friday, 18 February 2011
Thursday, 17 February 2011
(GB2011) Scrap the minimum wage for young people
Youth unemployment in the UK is at a record high, with nearly a million 16 to 24-year olds out of work – 20.5% of that age group. Around 600,000 of them have never worked at all. Youth unemployment is particularly worrying. If young people cannot get a job and learn work skills, and the basic habits of work, it blights their whole lives. Sadly, too few youngsters are not getting into the work stream but instead are getting drawn into the welfare stream. Instead of learning about life in work, they are learning about life on benefits.
Youth unemployment – and the same is true of immigrants and other minority groups – is always worst when times are hard. Employers keep the best workers and shed the labour they do not value so much. And the fact is that young people are just not worth as much to employers as older workers. They may have no marketable skills. They will have little or no experience of how workplaces operate. They might, after a decade and a half of state education, even lack basic life skills.
And yet government regulation forces employers to pay not less than £4.92 per hour for 18 to 20-year-olds and £5.93 for those 21 and above. It is plain that many employers think a large proportion of young people are just not worth that amount of money too them. Particularly when other employment legislation adds to their costs even more, and makes it almost impossible to get rid of workers they find they don't need. No wonder they aren't hiring.
It's time to scrap the minimum wage for young people. It just prices them out of jobs, so does them no good at all. For them, low-paid work is a way of building up some human capital that will make it easier to find a better job. But we stop them even getting that work at all – and all in the name of protecting workers.
HERE
Youth unemployment – and the same is true of immigrants and other minority groups – is always worst when times are hard. Employers keep the best workers and shed the labour they do not value so much. And the fact is that young people are just not worth as much to employers as older workers. They may have no marketable skills. They will have little or no experience of how workplaces operate. They might, after a decade and a half of state education, even lack basic life skills.
And yet government regulation forces employers to pay not less than £4.92 per hour for 18 to 20-year-olds and £5.93 for those 21 and above. It is plain that many employers think a large proportion of young people are just not worth that amount of money too them. Particularly when other employment legislation adds to their costs even more, and makes it almost impossible to get rid of workers they find they don't need. No wonder they aren't hiring.
It's time to scrap the minimum wage for young people. It just prices them out of jobs, so does them no good at all. For them, low-paid work is a way of building up some human capital that will make it easier to find a better job. But we stop them even getting that work at all – and all in the name of protecting workers.
HERE
NickKristof Nicholas Kristof
At hospital in #Bahrain. 600 brought here w/ injuries as of 8 am, more since. Beatings, shotgun pellets, rubber bullets.
2احداث البيضاء ليبيا 2011/2/16
Protesters chant "Gaddafi you dictator! Your turn has come! Your turn has come!"
Libyan protesters prepare for 'day of rage'
In a country where public dissent is rare, plans for the protests were being circulated by anonymous activists on social networking sites such as Facebook and Twitter, and it was not clear if the demonstrations would materialise.
Libya has been tightly controlled for over 40 years by Muammar Gaddafi – who is now Africa's longest-serving leader – but the oil exporter has felt the ripples from the overthrow of long-standing leaders in its neighbours Egypt and Tunisia.
Though some Libyans complain about unemployment, inequality and limits on political freedoms, analysts say an Egypt-style revolt is unlikely because the government can use oil revenues to smooth over most social problems.
Witnesses and local media reported that several hundred people clashed with police and Gaddafi supporters on Tuesday night in the city of Benghazi, about 1,000km (600 miles) east of the Libyan capital.
Late on Wednesday evening, it was impossible to contact witnesses in Benghazi because telephone connections to the city appeared to be out of order.
State media reported there were pro-Gaddafi protests too across the country, with people chanting "We sacrifice our blood and souls for you, our leader!" and "We are a generation built by Muammar and anyone who opposes it will be destroyed!"
People posting messages on opposition website Libya Our Home, which is based outside the country, urged Libyans to protest and drew parallels with the uprising this month that toppled the Egyptian president, Hosni Mubarak.
"From every square in our beloved country, people should all come together in one city and one square to make this regime and its supporters afraid, and force them to run away because they are cowards," said a post from someone called Mustafa.
A Facebook page dedicated to the planned protest urged followers to "make it a day of rage in Libya".
Gaddafi says Libya does not need to import western concepts of democracy because it is run on his system - known as the Third Universal Theory - under which citizens govern themselves through grassroots institutions called popular committees.
Thursday is the anniversary of clashes on 17 February 2006 in Benghazi, when security forces killed several protesters who were attacking the city's Italian consulate.
Amnesty International voiced concern about a new crackdown. "The Libyan authorities must allow peaceful protests, not try to stifle them with heavy-handed repression," it said in a statement.
@'The Guardian'
Bahrain
nolanjazeera Dan Nolan
WARNING:horrific picRT @joshmull @StateDept @PJCrowley Still dont feel like making statement on Bahrain crackdown?
monaeltahawy Mona Eltahawy
Bahrain authorities launch surprise attack on protesters
Security forces in tiny but strategic Bahrain launched a brutal assault early Thursday against at least 1,000 defiant anti-government protesters, including children, camped out in tents in the capital's Pearl Square. At least two were killed and 50 hurt.
A barrage of tear gas canisters thundered across the square about 3 a.m. as dozens of police cars, armored security vehicles and ambulances converged on a makeshift tent city in the center of Manama that was beginning to resemble a smaller version of Tahrir Square in Cairo, where Egyptian protesters this month were successful in overthrowing their president.After a peaceful, festive evening, most of the protesters in Pearl Square were asleep when the attack began, witnesses said, noting that no steps had been taken to guard the area against the security forces, even though two people had been killed in clashes with them earlier in the week.
"They told us we had three days in the square," said one man as he ran from the scene. "And then they attack us on the second day."
As flashing blue police car lights cast an eerie strobe effect down side streets and a helicopter swooped overhead, packs of young men with bandannas covering their faces to thwart billowing clouds of gas fled the area, flashing V signs while shouting slogans and warnings...
Continue reading
Seena, 9, grieves at the funeral for an eight-month-old baby drowned when an asylum-seeker boat broke up on rocks on Christmas Island. Photo: Getty
Boy returning to Christmas Island
Ning Nong - Ning Nong Typecast II
1. Medicine – One More (Creation)
2. Serena-Maneesh – Honeyjinx (4AD)
3. Slowdive – Morningrise (Creation)
4. Arab Strap – Last Orders (Chemikal Underground)
5. Yo La Tengo – Saturday (Matador)
6. Unrest – Imperial (Teen Beat)
7. Moose – Suzanne (Hut)
8. Altar Eagle – Spy Movie (Type)
9. His Name Is Alive – Lip (4AD)
10. Swirlies – Bell (Taang!)
11. Dinosaur Jr – In A Jar (sst)
12. Swervedriver – Duel (Creation)
13. The Verve – Drive You Home (Hut)
14. Blur – Resigned (Food)
15. Pale Saints – Kinky Love (4AD)
16. The House Of Love – Love In A Car (Creation)
17. Ride – Like A Daydream (Creation)
18. The Boo Radleys – Almost Nearly There (Creation)
19. Teenage Fanclub – Alcoholiday (Creation)
20. The Jesus & Mary Chain – Something I Can’t Have (Blanco Y Negro)
21. Interpol – Not Even Jail (Matador)
22. Gorky’s Zygotic Mynci – Where Does Yer Go Now? (Mantra)
23. Mogwai – Year 2000 Non-Compliant Cardia (Chemikal Underground)
24. Sunset – Man’s Heart Complaint (Autobus)
25. Flying Saucer Attack – In The Light Of Time (Domino)
26. Camera Obscura – My Maudlin Career (4AD)
27. My Bloody Valentine – Sometimes (Creation)
28. Swallow – Peekaboo (4AD)
29. Kate Bush – Cloudbusting (emi)
30. Tindersticks – Drunk Tank (This Way Up)
31. Bark Psychosis – All Different Things (Cheree)
32. David Sylvian – Let The Happiness In (Virgin)
33. Cocteau Twins – Ella Megalast Burls Forever (4AD)
Via
David Rodigan interviews Bob Marley (1980)
In 1980 I had the privilege of interviewing Bob Marley in London on his way back from having performed at the Zimbabwe Independence Celebrations. This is an extract from that interview. (David Rodigan)
LISTEN HERE
Butterflies feat. John Malkovich
Design/VFX - Gentleman Scholar
Creative Directors - Will Johnson & William Campbell
Producer - Tyler Locke
Executive Producer - Rob Sanborn
Editor - Josh Bodnar/The Whitehouse
Designers/Compositors - William Campbell, Will Johnson, Tommy Wooh, Daniel Blank, Paul Yeh, Heather Aquino, Claudia Yi Leon, Joseph Chan
Director - Sandro Miller
Music Composer - Matt Hutchinson
via
Iran protester's death 'hijacked by regime'
The Iranian regime has been accused of hijacking the death of a young pro-democracy protester killed during rallies in Tehran on Monday.
A family member of Saane Zhaleh, a 26-year-old theatre student at Tehran University of Arts, told the Guardian that the Iranian authorities had launched a campaign to depict the pro-opposition protester as a member of the government-sponsored basiji militia who had been killed by what they described as terrorists.
"They [security forces] have killed him and now they want to hijack his dead body and exploit his funeral for their own purposes. His family is totally devastated and inundated in sorrow," said the family member, who asked not to be identified.
Opposition websites reported that two protesters were killed in clashes between security forces and thousands of defiant protesters who marched in a banned rally organised by the leaders of the green movement on Monday.
Iranian state news agencies later identified them as Zhaleh, a member of Iran's Kurd and Sunni minority, and 22-year-old Mohammad Mokhtari, but blamed the opposition for their death.
Iran's semi-official FARS news agency published a basiji identity card that it said belonged to Zhaleh, but the opposition immediately questioned its authenticity. In response, activists sympathetic to the green movement published a photo of Zhaleh on social networking websites that showed him in a meeting with grand Ayatollah Montazeri, a leading opposition figure who died in 2009.
Authorities staged a funeral at the Tehran University of Arts but did not permit Zhaleh's family to attend. Witnesses told opposition websites that the hundreds of basiji members who were bussed in to the university to participate in the funeral outnumbered the students and clashed with them.
According to the family member, Zhaleh's parents and siblings – who live in the western city of Paveh in Kermanshah province – were asked not to attend the funeral in Tehran and were threatened that Zhaleh's body would not be handed to them if they spoke to foreign media.
"Zhaleh's family are under pressure not to deny the way the officials have portrayed him. His father was forced to give a short interview to the state television. The authorities are depicting him completely upside down, they have silenced the family by threatening not to hand over his body," the family member said.
At the same time, Sajad Rezaee, a member of the Islamic Society student group at Tehran University of Arts, told Kaleme.org, the official website of Mir Hossein Mousavi, that the dead protester was not a member of the basij but was a pro-Mousavi activist during the 2009 election campaign.
Shahabaddin Sheikhi, a Kurdish journalist based in Germany, said: "The authorities' handling of Zhaleh's death reminds me of that of Neda Agha Soltan, the girl whose story took the world's attention. In Neda's case, they also tried to portray her as pro-regime demonstrator and they lied several times to impose their own version of the story but that finally did not prevail. Same thing is happening with Zhaleh because they are afraid of the world's reaction and also the reaction of the people inside the country. They can not get rid of this disgrace and taint easily."
Monday's protest, inspired by the uprisings in Egypt and Tunisia, marked the Iranian opposition's first attempt in more than a year to hold anti-government demonstrations.
On Tuesday, the majority of the Iranian parliament called on the Iranian judiciary to put opposition leaders Mousavi and Mehdi Karroubi on trial and sentence them to death. Both leaders of the green movement have been placed under house arrest for the past couple of days.
Saeed Kamali Dehghan @'The Guardian'
Glenn Greenwald Discusses Wikileaks Smear Campaign with Matt Miller
"Given my involvement in this story, I’m going to defer to others in terms of the reporting. But — given the players involved and the facts that continue to emerge — this story is far too significant to allow to die due to lack of attention. Many of the named targets are actively considering commencing civil proceedings (which would entail compulsory discovery) as well as ethical grievances with the relevant Bar associations. As the episode with Palantir demonstrates, simply relying on the voluntary statements of the corporations involved ensures that the actual facts will remain concealed if not actively distorted. The DOJ ought to investigate this as well, but for reasons I detailed on Friday, that is unlikely in the extreme. Entities of this type routinely engage in conduct like this with impunity, and the serendipity that led to their exposure in this case should be seized to impose some accountability. That this was discovered through a random email hack — and that these firms felt so free to propose these schemes in writing and, at least from what is known, not a single person raised any objection at all — underscores how common this behavior is."
Via
More facts emerge about the leaked smear campaigns
jilliancyork Jillian C. York
Re-read #netfreedom speech. Incredibly disappointed that she mentioned circumvention but not the US-made tools that need circumventing.
Meet the International Music Registry
“All deep things are song”, said Thomas Carlyle. “It seems somehow the very central essence of us, song; as if all the rest were but wrappages and hulls!”
“Music is what feelings sound like”, said an unknown author.
“If I were to begin life again, I would devote it to music”, said Sydney Smith. “It is the only cheap and unpunished rapture upon earth.”
All wrong. Especially Sydney Smith. Because these days, music is neither cheap, nor unpunished rapture.
It’s a hard-core corporate commodity to be sold for maximum profit.
And punishment is an absolutely integral part of it.
While you hold that thought, a quote more appropriate to the 21st digital century comes from Francis Gurry, director general of WIPO, .
It’s on the creation of the International Music Registry which, “would need to be a global public asset, based on voluntary participation and available to all as a basis for operating or building business models for the management or exploitation of rights”, he says.
Ahhhhhhh. A statement sufficient to warm the cold, black hearts of the people behind the dying Big 4 labels, Vivendi Universal (France), Sony (Japan), EMI (Britain), and Warner Music (US, but controlled by a Canadian).
It’s their unbridled avarice and lust for domination and control which makes such a registry necessary.
“The project is a collaboration of the worldwide music sector, facilitated by WIPO, aimed at facilitating licensing in the digital environment by providing easier access to reliable information about musical works and sound recordings”, says the web site, going on >>>
The amazing growth and development of the Internet as the delivery mechanism for music over the last decade has challenged the music rights management architecture, which was not designed to facilitate use of music in the digital world.
We need to make it faster, easier, and simpler for those who want to use music for legal services to find who owns what rights in music – and not just in the developed world, but throughout the world.
What all this points to is the need to create an international system that ‘ties together’ all the different rights-management systems in use in different countries. An accurate, authoritative, registry of information about musical works, sound recordings and music videos is a fundamental, essential public good that supports a healthy ecosystem for digital music.
The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations that promotes balanced international intellectual property (IP) protection as a means of rewarding creativity, stimulating innovation, and contributing to economic development and access to knowledge in the public interest. As an immediate priority, WIPO is facilitating a platform for exchange among the worldwide music sector to look at the challenges facing music in the digital environment. The International Music Registry project is focussed on ensuring that such a registry collaborates with existing efforts around the world to improve access to music rights information. The result will lead to a more transparent, inclusive architecture that operates for the benefit of all stakeholders.
Below are items number 1 and 2 in the FAQ >>>
What is the nature of the problem the dialogue is looking at?
It is widely understood that the way all rights in music are presently managed was designed for territory-by-territory exploitation of physical products and not for the digital environment, where services need to ‘look global’ and allow consumers from multiple countries to easily access as large a collection of copyrighted materials as possible. The manual licensing of music country-by-country for the same content each time though generally from different rightsholders creates massive inefficiencies and a high cost of acquiring legal licenses to commercialize music that is multiplied for every territory that a service wishes to operate in. It has other problems, amongst them:
- It requires each provider to expensively develop complex rights-management systems through custom-developed software to interact with the different rights-management systems of rightsholders in each country. This reduces the flexibility providers have in pricing their services to consumers and also reduces the amount that service providers can offer in licensing revenue.
- A fragmented availability of works, where the same service ends up providing different works and performances from one country to another, with no apparent way for the users to acquire legal access to all the material – even though they can often see it is available to someone, just not to them.
- The manual nature of licensing (and the costs of licensing this way) guarantees that many works which do not have a clear likelihood of commercial success are largely, or entirely, unavailable legally for the consumer – while the nature of the Internet makes global availability of these works from unlicensed services easy – and creates an incentive for the unscrupulous to meet the legally-unmet demand.
- The complexity and cost of the licensing process, due to the large number of entities a service provider must acquire the various rights from, creates a significant barrier to entry for the development of innovative content services.
The worry across the industry is that it is becoming increasingly difficult to ‘compete with free’ and persuade consumers used to easy and convenient access to music from non-legal sites to start paying for it – and that the longer this situation continues the more difficult ‘retraining’ especially younger music lovers to use paid services will become.
What all this points to is the need to create an international system that ‘ties together’ all the different rights-management systems in use in different countries through electronic interfaces, making it much easier and cheaper for services to gain legal access to rights and ultimately to license them.
The first step – getting the stakeholders together to discuss first principles
In order to create such a system, the organizing committee of this dialogue is inviting a key group of stakeholders from music to get together to discuss at a high level:
The proposition that an international registry of rights is an essential prerequisite to healthy, multi-territory licensing of music in the digital world.
What the high-level principles underpinning such a registry would be
What institution could be the ‘home’ and operator of such a system which would be trusted by both licensors, licensees, and governments to administer such a valuable common international resource
What the high-level principles underpinning such a registry would be
What institution could be the ‘home’ and operator of such a system which would be trusted by both licensors, licensees, and governments to administer such a valuable common international resource
How to move forward with the next steps
The World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO) has offered to host this meeting and provide technical services to it, as well as make its experts available to provide information requested by the dialogue as its members may require.
Hear the merry tinkle of cash registers ringing up Big 4 profits.
The new sound of music.
Where do we, the people come into it?
We don’t.
Jon Newton @'p2pnet'
Donald Rumsfeld's revisionism doesn't explain Iraq
We were Defense Department officials through the early phases of the war and worked for the CPA in Baghdad. We have defended many of the difficult decisions Rumsfeld made and respect his service to our country. But his book paints an inaccurate and unfair history of U.S. policymaking concerning Iraq's political transition.
Rumsfeld's basic theme is that the CPA erred by failing to grant Iraqis "the right to govern themselves" early in the U.S.-led occupation. Rumsfeld claims that he favored a "swift transition" of power to an "Iraqi transitional government" and that the Bush administration formally endorsed this strategy when it approved the Pentagon's plan for an Iraqi Interim Authority in March 2003. He writes that the head of the CPA, L. Paul Bremer, unilaterally decided not to implement this plan.
But Rumsfeld's own contemporaneous memos undermine this notion. The 26 "Principles for Iraq - Policy Guidelines" that Rumsfeld gave Bremer in May 2003 said nothing about handing real power to Iraqis...
Continue reading
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
