Saturday, 11 December 2010

AMERICA: Y UR PEEPS B SO DUM?


If you hang out much with thinking people, conversation eventually turns to the serious political and cultural questions of our times. Such as: How can the Americans remain so consistently brain-fucked? Much of the world, including plenty of Americans, asks that question as they watch U.S. culture go down like a thrashing mastodon giving itself up to some Pleistocene tar pit.
One explanation might be the effect of 40 years of deep fried industrial chicken pulp, and 44 ounce Big Gulp soft drinks. Another might be pop culture, which is not culture at all of course, but marketing. Or we could blame it on digital autism: Ever watch commuter monkeys on the subway poking at digital devices, stroking the touch screen for hours on end? That wrinkled Neolithic brows above the squinting red eyes?
But a more reasonable explanation is that, (A) we don't even know we are doing it, and (B) we cling to institutions dedicated to making sure we never find out.
As William Edwards Deming famously demonstrated, no system can understand itself, and why it does what it does, including the American social system. Not knowing shit about why your society does what it makes for a pretty nasty case of existential unease. So we create institutions whose function is to pretend to know, which makes everyone feel better. Unfortunately, it also makes the savviest among us -- those elites who run the institutions -- very rich, or safe from the vicissitudes that buffet the rest of us.
Directly or indirectly, they understand that the real function of American social institutions is to justify, rationalize and hide the true purpose of cultural behavior from the lumpenproletariat, and to shape that behavior to the benefit of the institution's members. "Hey, they're a lump. Whaddya expect us to do?"
Doubting readers may consider America's health institutions, the insurance corporations, hospital chains, physicians' lobbies. Between them they have established a perfectly legal right to clip you and me for thousands of dollars at their own discretion. That we so rabidly defend their right to gouge us, given all the information available in the digital age, mystifies the world.
Two hundred years ago no one would have thought sheer volume of available facts in the digital information age would produce informed Americans. Founders of the republic, steeped in the Enlightenment as they were, and believers in an informed citizenry being vital to freedom and democracy, would be delirious with joy at the prospect. Imagine Jefferson and Franklin high on Google.
The fatal assumption was that Americans would choose to think and learn, instead of cherry picking the blogs and TV channels to reinforce their particular branded choice cultural ignorance, consumer, scientific or political, but especially political. Tom and Ben could never have guessed we would chase prepackaged spectacle, junk science, and titillating rumor such as death panels, Obama as a socialist Muslim and Biblical proof that Adam and Eve rode dinosaurs around Eden. In a nation that equates democracy with everyman's right to an opinion, no matter how ridiculous, this was probably inevitable. After all, dumb people choose dumb stuff. That's why they are called dumb.
But throw in sixty years of television's mind puddling effects, and you end up with 24 million Americans watching Bristol Palin thrashing around on Dancing with the Stars, then watch her being interviewed with all seriousness on the networks as major news. The inescapable conclusion of half of heartland America is that her mama must certainly be presidential material, even if Bristol cannot dance. It ain't a pretty picture out there in Chattanooga and Keokuk.
The other half, the liberal half, concludes that Bristol's bad dancing is part of her spawn-of-the-Devil mama's plan to take over the country, and make millions in the process, not to mention make Tina Fey and Jon Stewart richer than they already are. That's a tall order for a squirrel brained woman who recently asked a black president to "refutiate" the NAACP (though I kinda like refutiate, myself). Cultural stupidity accounts for virtually every aspect of Sarah Palin, both as a person and a political icon. Which, come to think of it, may be a pretty good reason not to "misunderstimate" her. After all, we're still talking about her in both political camps. And the woman OWNS the Huffington Post, fer Christsake. Not to mention a franchise on cultural ignorance...
Continue reading

WikiRebels

@biz & @ev, Is Twitter suspending #payback supporter accounts? If so, why? Isn't Twitter supposed to be an open forum?
Anonymous Operations AnonymousOps quick qummary: #government #lobby got too careless and arrogant. #people suspected but now they see proof. unclear consequences. #wikileaks
#Twitter closed @Op_Payback AGAIN, THEY DONT WANT FREE SPEECH!!! #anonops #payback #Wikileaks #cablegate Spread the word!!!

Anonymous cyberwarriors stun experts

 We all are #Anonymous. Anyone can lead, everybody will follow. An elusive force, invisible, invincible. #payback #wikileaks #cablegate

Calling the Troops to Battle: EFF’s Say No To Censorship Campaign

Wikileaks and the difference between information and knowledge

Shutdown the Internet

CLICK

Hamza Boudlal


KACM Marrakech vs OCK Khouribga

Friday, 10 December 2010

Chatroulette, iPad, Justin Bieber: The Year According to Google



Two sides to every story...

One way of looking at it...
...& another!
(Click to enlarge pics)

MRC Riddims - Sex and Money

Anger at 'slave trader' Assange: WikiLeaks loyalists decide to break away

 
"Less political"?  What's the fugn point? More wank esp as Domschelt-Berg aka. Daniel Schmitt has an axe to grind...oh and a book to sell!

Game change

If this image is to be believed—and I have no reason not to, other than that I found it on the internet—the rebel squadrons behind Anonymous (attn. "news" hacks - that would be an entirely different group from Wikileaks and/or Wikipedia) are about to change their approach. So far, as we've witnessed, they have been launching point-and-click distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks at companies perceived as the enemies of Wikileaks. Those targets included Mastercard, Paypal, and Visa (companies that froze donation funding), and Amazon (which denied hosting services). The new approach suggests more sophisticated thinking. This new mission, apparently, is to actually read the cables Wikileaks has published and find the most interesting bits that haven't been publicized yet, then publicize them.
In my opinion, this action would have far more positive impact. Anonymous often repeats the Orwell quote, "In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." Looks like they decided to take those words to heart.
Sean Bonner @'Boing Boing'

(TEDTalk) Christopher "moot" Poole: The case for anonymity online

HA!

will the real "Anonymous" please stand up? moot

 ron paul /b/,

i keep getting a lot of requests to be connected with "Anonymous". can you guys please point him out to me??????


much appreciated

love,

mootykins

Defend Assange and WikiLeaks on Human Rights Day in Melbourne

December 10, 4.30pm at the State Library.

Spread the word...

The demonstration will go till about 6 or so - so people should come after work.
...
For more information on the Melbourne demonstration call:
Vashti: 0423407910
Charles Custer ChinaGeeks BBC, CNN, etc. websites blocked. Happy Human Rights Day, everyone!

GB 2010 ("Off with their heads!")

Snakes on mathematical planes

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

GB2010 (Paint bombs)

Cyber attacks: payback time

In a cyber attack known as Operation Payback, a group of online activists called Anonymous targeted the websites of companies that had treated WikiLeaks like a bad smell. Visa, MasterCard, Paypal and Amazon have all had their websites, and in some cases their services, affected. Welcome to the world of the chaotic good. It is chaotic. But is it good?
These companies all considered that their association with WikiLeaks damaged their brand image, a reflection prompted in some cases by a helpful call from the US state department. In essence they are trying to have it both ways: pretending in their marketing that they are free spirits and enablers of the cyber world, but only living up to that image as long as they don't upset anyone really important. At Amazon there is real confusion between the two roles: it refused to host WikiLeaks but continued to sell an eBook of the leaked cables online.
The hacktivists of Anonymous may be accused of many things – such as immaturity or being run by a herd instinct. But theirs is the cyber equivalent of non-violent action or civil disobedience. It disrupts rather than damages. In challenging the credit card companies and the web hosts in this way, they are reminding these businesses that their brand reputation relies not only on how the state department sees them, but also on how they maintain their independence in the eyes of their users.
Not all the targets of the internet activists are the right ones. The website of the Swedish prosecution authority, which is currently attempting to extradite Julian Assange, the founder of Wikileaks, on rape charges, and the website of Claes Borgström, the Stockholm lawyer representing the two women who made the allegations, were also brought down. As our interview with Mr Borgström makes clear, these women are going through hell: first for being the alleged victims of sexual assault, and second for being accused of involvement in some form of CIA honeytrap. The women's right to anonymity has been abandoned online as bloggers rake through their CVs. In Sweden, as in other countries, the burden of proof lies with the prosecution, and the test, beyond reasonable doubt, is set high. Far better would be to let the legal systems in Sweden and Britain take their course.
In times when big business and governments attempt to monitor and control everything, there is a need as never before for an internet that remains a free and universal form of communication. WikiLeaks' chief crime has been to speak truth to power. What is at stake is nothing less than the freedom of the internet. All the rest is a sideshow distracting attention from the real battle that is being fought. We should all keep focus on the true target. 
Editorial
The Guardian, Fri 10 Dec 2010 00.01 GMT
John Perry Barlow JPBarlow RT @opendna: @Anon_Operations is the impostor/satire account. The threat vs EFF is a hoax. [The attack is real.]

Freedom

"You can call me a 4channer, you can call me a blogger, a hacker, a video gamer, you can call me whatever epithet makes you feel somehow superior, but you are wrong. I am none of those things, nor would I need to be to participate in the attack (I did not).
Anyone who understands what DDoS attacks do would never claim that they would cause widespread havoc or serious economic damage. They simply are a way to be a nuisance, to cause a little disruption, and to get the attention of perhaps a few stuffed suits so that next time, they won't sell their souls so publicly to quiet a voice that they and their government friends find so uncomfortable.
You can laugh at the people doing this, and console yourself with how geeky they all must be and think of all the socially acceptable friends you have. Or you can stop and consider what you can do yourself to stand up for a free press in this country"
Comment @'The Lede'

GB2010 (Fire of London)

John Perry Barlow JPBarlow The EFF server is under attack. I would be disappointed if this were the result of my opposition to DDoS. #Anonymous?

Girlz With Gunz #133

GB2010 (The Lawyer's view)

David Allen Green davidallengreen Abuse of police coercive power now far greater risk than any terrorist threat.

World's oldest computer recreated in Lego


It's the oldest known computer, a relic dating back 2000 years and rediscovered at the bottom of the ocean. Now designer Andrew Carol has brought it back to life - using Lego. 
That's not to say this project was child's play - making the device was an engineering feat that required specialist Lego, and a lot of patience (see stop motion video above).
The idea came from journalist Adam Rutherford who had seen a Babbage Difference Engine built by Carol and got in touch. "I asked him if he'd heard of the mechanism, and if he thought it was doable in Lego," says Rutherford. "A few weeks later, he sent me some pictures of a demo version he'd knocked up. It was stunning." 
The Antikythera mechanism is an astronomical computer thought to have been built in 150BC.  It was rediscovered on the Antikythera shipwreck in 1900 and has since astounded researchers by its mechanical complexity. It's been recreated numerous times, but to the best of our knowledge, this is the first time a working replica has been made from Lego.  "We recreated a 1st century BC computer out of the best toy humankind has ever invented," Rutherford says.
Catherine de Lange @'New Scientist'
WikiLeaks wikileaks Cablegate: Pfizer used dirty tricks to avoid clinical trial payout | http://is.gd/iszst

WikiLeaks cables suggest Burma is building secret nuclear sites

Thin Lizzy & Granny!



Now this is a grandmother with TASTE! Rock that solo!!!

Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani 'at home' pictures trigger confusion over her fate

Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani with her son Sajjad at home in northwestern Iran. Photograph: AFP/Getty Images  
Confusion surrounded the fate of Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani, the woman whose sentence of death by stoning for adultery triggered an international outcry, after photographs of her meeting her son at home were released by Iran's English channel television tonight.
Pictures from state-run Press TV showed her meeting Sajjad at home in Osku in northwestern Iran, boosting supporters' hopes that she had been released.
But footage of Ashtiani broadcast by the station later raised questions about whether she had actually been released from prison, or whether Iranian authorities had merely taken her to her home to collect evidence against her and film a confession.
In a short clip she is seen to say: "We planned to kill my husband."
The move came weeks after Iran signalled it might spare the life of Mohammadi Ashtiani, 43, a mother of two who has been in Tabriz prison since 2006, and who faced execution by stoning for "having an illicit relationship outside marriage".
An international campaign for Ashtiani's release has been launched by her son Sajad, who was later arrested along with her lawyer Houtan Kian and two German journalists who were arrested after trying to interview her have also been freed.
The extraordinary case brought an unwelcome focus on human rights in Iran at a time when the Islamic regime was seeking to return to normal after the unrest that followed Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's victory in a disputed presidential election in June 2009.
Ecstatic campaigners initially hailed the news. "This is the happiest day in my life," said Mina Ahadi of the International Committee against Stoning (Icas). "I'm very happy for her son, Sajad, who fought single-handedly and bravely in Iran to defend his mother and tell the world that she is innocent. I'm sure that this day will be written in Iranian history books, if not the world's, as a day of victory for human rights campaigners."
International pressure over Mohammadi Ashtiani's fate began with campaigning on social networking sites and was later taken up by mainstream media as protest rallies were held in London, Rome and Washington, with support from Amnesty and other human rights groups, as well as a star-studded cast of celebrities including Colin Firth and Emma Thompson in Britain.
Iran's friends and enemies tried to intervene. Brazil's president, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, offered to give Mohammadi Ashtiani asylum in his country, while the US secretary of state, Hillary Clinton, urged Tehran to respect the fundamental freedoms of its citizens. Britain's foreign office minister Alistair Burt condemned the laws used against her as "medieval."
Tehran hit back furiously. Kayhan, a conservative paper, called Carla Bruni-Sarkozy, the French president's wife, a "prostitute" who "deserved death" after she condemned the sentence.
Iran accused its critics of trying to turn a criminal case into something of wider significance. "It has become a symbol of women's freedom in western nations and with impudence they want to free her," the foreign ministry spokesman Ramin Mehmanparast protested last month. "They are trying to use this ordinary case as a lever of pressure against our nation."
Evidently feeling the heat, Iran described her as "an adulterous woman" and introduced new charges, portraying her as a murderer who killed her husband. Mohammadi Ashtiani was put on state TV three times to confess to her charges but human rights activists insisted she had been tortured.
But signs of a possible change of heart came after Mohammad Javad Larijani, a top adviser to the Iranian supreme leader, Ali Khamenei, visited the UN last month and invited the secretary-general, Ban Ki-moon, to visit Iran. Still, he compared Ashtiani's case with that of Teresa Lewis, who was executed by lethal injection in the US state of Virginia for arranging the murder of her husband and stepson.
Under Iranian sharia law, those sentenced to death by stoning are buried up to the neck (or to the waist in the case of men), and those attending the public execution are called upon to throw stones. If the convicted person manages to free themselves from the hole, the death sentence is commuted.
Mohammadi Ashtiani was convicted in May 2006 of conducting an illicit relationship outside marriage. She endured a sentence of 99 lashes, but her case was re-opened when a court in Tabriz suspected her of murdering her husband. She was acquitted, but the adultery charge was reviewed and a death penalty handed down on the basis of "judge's knowledge" – a loophole that allows for subjective judicial rulings where no conclusive evidence is present.
Five years ago when Mohammadi Ashtiani was flogged, Sajad, then 17, was present. "They lashed her in front my eyes and this has been carved in my mind since then," he told the Guardian before his own arrest.
Iran has rarely carried out stonings in recent years. But it executed 388 people last year – more than any other country apart from China, according to Amnesty International. Most were hanged.
Ten Iranian women and four men are on death row awaiting execution by stoning, among them Azar Bagheri, 19, Iran Iskandari, 31, Kheyrieh Valania, 42, Sarimeh Sajadi, 30, Kobra Babaei, and Afsaneh R.
Saeed Kamali Dehghan and Ian Black @'The Guardian'

GB2010 (Trafalgar Square)

Amazon share price plunges ahead of promised cyber ‘payback’ for WikiLeaks censorship

Is the world witnessing its first wave of digital sit-ins?
A group of "hacktivists" calling themselves "Anonymous" has been waging an "all-out cyber war" the last several days against corporate and public entities that have acted to censor secrets website WikiLeaks. They disrupted Visa and MasterCard transactions on Wednesday, bringing down websites for the world's two largest credit card providers. They stopped a Swiss bank from doing business and even knocked websites for a US Senator and former governor offline, with yet more attacks promised.
All of it -- or at least most, they insist -- is part of a voluntary campaign of cyber disobedience, to ensure these powerful entities know their actions are unpopular. Using a piece of software called "Low Orbit Ion Cannon," named after a weapon in the PC strategy game "Command and Conquer," volunteers can point their computers at a domain and begin saturating any server with traffic. If enough people join in, the site inevitably falls.
Their next target: Amazon.com. After announcing plans to blast the site with gobs of traffic, effectively denying page-loads to its regular customers, Amazon's share price on the New York Stock Exchange (symbol: AMZN) began to plummet, down 1.17 percent by 12:10 pm eastern. The site still appeared to be online.
"Anonymous" also targeted online payments leader PayPal, owned by California-based eBay, taking the site offline intermittently early Thursday. Service to PayPal.com was intermittent at time of this writing.
PayPal's blog had been previously been taken offline by denial of service attacks after the firm froze one of WikiLeaks' accounts. It claimed to have released WikiLeaks' money on Wednesday night.
Attempting to explain their actions, PayPal Vice President Osama Bedier told a European audience that the US State Department had informed the company that WikiLeaks was engaging in illegal activities. That turned out to be untrue: the State Dept. never sent them such a letter -- it was directed to WikiLeaks -- and the alleged crime was committed not by the media organization, but by the individual who stole the information.
The "Anonymous" group, which uses a headless man in a black suit as its insignia, reveled in the digital mayhem they've caused, joking on Twitter mid-morning that they'd sold shares in Amazon to buy new suits.
The night prior, Twitter moved to ban an account that had been helping direct the voluntary botnets being led against some of the world's most hardened server farms, after "Anonymous" hackers claimed to have posted a list of 10,000 MasterCard numbers with expiration dates. A MasterCard spokesman told Raw Story the numbers weren't theirs. Many of the numbers on the list began with a '4', which is what all Visa accounts start with. It was unclear whether the card numbers were genuine or not.
WikiLeaks issued a statement Thursday saying they were in no way affiliated with or connected to "Anonymous."
"We neither condemn nor applaud these attacks," WikiLeaks spokesman Kristinn Hrafnsson said in a media advisory. "We believe they are a reflection of public opinion on the actions of the targets."
Stephen C Webster @'Raw Story'