Dear readers' editor,
I am writing to you to express my anger, disappointment and sadness that Julie Burchill's piece
'Transsexuals should cut it out' was allowed to appear in
The Observer today, and on
The Guardian's
Comment is Free website. I've never written to complain about an
article in a newspaper or magazine before, and it's particularly
dispiriting that I have to do so to the group that gave me my break in
journalism, something they did for reasons which I thought were sound.
As you may know, I spent more than two years working on a rolling blog
for The Guardian called 'A Transgender Journey', commissioned by Rachel
Dixon and Kate Carter, and hosted at Life and Style. (If not, it's
here.) I wrote a blog post elsewhere explaining why I did this, giving background on
The Guardian and
Observer's historical record on transgender issues, which is
here
- to condense the post, the newspapers had published a number of pieces
over the years attacking transgender, and in particular transsexual
people from an ostensibly ethical, socialist and 'radical feminist'
position, and that the structure and ideology of the publications and
the newspaper industry had allowed them to continue abusing positions of
power to ridicule, mock and attack a historically marginalised group of
people. (I've lectured on this, too -
here.)
As a result, I thought the Guardian Media Group were improving on trans
issues - it published my comments pieces, people such as Roz Kaveney,
Jane Fae, Paris Lees and Natacha Kennedy, and covered transgender and
genderqueer artists such as EVA & ADELE. Also, your counterpart at
the Guardian, Chris Elliott, contacted me for some advice when writing
an
open letter promising that the
Guardian
would improve its attitude towards trans people - so it's particularly
embittering that these principles do not seem to have been adopted at
The Observer.
I have registered my feelings on a comment on Burchill's piece and on
Twitter, and I am talking to other trans contributors to the
Guardian/Observer, and to non-trans people I know who contribute, about the best course of action.
At the very least, I really feel that someone of seniority at
The Observer should
offer a full apology and an explanation of how this came to appear in
the newspaper. The sooner the better, obviously - I'm very proud to have
written for GMG, and of the specific pieces that I've contributed, but
at the moment I'm trying hard not to feel that all of my work for you
has been a waste of time.
I look forward to hearing from you soon.
Yours sincerely,
Juliet Jacques
[EDIT] Have linked to a PDF of the article in question kindly supplied by Exile contrib Helen so as to not direct any traffic to the disgraceful article in question