One out of every 100 people in the United States
is imprisoned.
Even though we are 5 percent of the world's population, we have 25
percent of the prisoners in the world. We are number one in the world in
the number of people we imprison - we even beat China. A normal
reaction to this situation would be to try to reform our laws, our
judicial system - including sentencing - our prison system and our
society so that we would not have the disconcerting distinction of being
the number-one jailer in the world.
Instead, in the past decade, there has been a movement to privatize
more and more of our state and federal prisons to save money (which has
not materialized) and ease overcrowding under the pressure of the
courts. This has led to a wide world of influence peddling, self-dealing
and lobbying while preying on a captured group of people to fill prison
beds. Just as I have feared that privatizing the logistics of war will
encourage private war-service industries to lobby for a hot war or long
occupation to keep their industries viable, there has emerged a group of
prison industries, state and federal legislators, and other players who
will continue to benefit from our disgraceful ranking as the world's
largest warden.
There are two very large and influential prison companies in the
United States who are manipulating the system to make sure they have
plenty of business: The GEO Group (formerly Wackenhut) and Corrections
Corporation of America (CCA). In the first part of this two-part series,
I will explore The GEO Group's influence peddling; next week, I will
look at CCA.
If you have any doubt in your mind that improving society and
lowering the number of prisoners in our country (normally considered a
worthy social goal) is a threat to the prison industry business, all you
need to do is to read about that concern in The GEO Group's 2011 annual
report:
In particular, the demand for our correctional and detention
facilities and services and BI's [a prison industry company Geo acquired
in 2011] services could be adversely affected by changes in existing
criminal or immigration laws, crime rates in jurisdictions in which we
operate, the relaxation of criminal or immigration enforcement efforts,
leniency in conviction, sentencing or deportation practices, and the
decriminalization of certain activities that are currently proscribed by
criminal laws or the loosening of immigration laws. For example, any
changes with respect to the decriminalization of drugs and controlled
substances could affect the number of persons arrested, convicted,
sentenced and incarcerated, thereby potentially reducing demand for
correctional facilities to house them. Similarly, reductions in crime
rates could lead to reductions in arrests, convictions and sentences
requiring incarceration at correctional facilities. Immigration reform
laws which are currently a focus for legislators and politicians at the
federal, state and local level also could materially adversely impact
us...
MORE