Anti-SCAF march attacked

Jon Cruddas MP in conversation with Owen Jones

On Monday 4th July, in a special Young Fabian event, Jon Cruddas MP quizzed Owen Jones, author of Chavs: The Demonization of the Working Class, a recent book of the week for both The Independent and The Times.
You can find Jon's review of the book in the Independent here.
There is a blurb of the book here, plus selected quotes from reviews by Polly Toynbee, Carole Cadwalladr, and Suzanne Moore among others.
You can now listen to that evening
HERE

Hacking was endemic at the 'Mirror', says former reporter

End of a nightmare for U.K. media

Rupert Murdoch gives evidence on the News of the World phone-hacking scandal to the Culture, Media and Sport Select Committee, in Portcullis House in central London Tuesday, July 19, 2011. (AP Photo)

We have awoken from a nightmare in Britain to discover that it was all true but that it is now over. Rupert Murdoch and his children will never be able to restore their family's profound malign influence over British society and politics.
Murdoch's power in Britain relied upon two media--newspapers and satellite television--that played distinct yet complementary roles in his empire. Murdoch owns four newspapers: two tabloids, the Sun and (until it was shuttered in the most recent phase of the phone-hacking scandal) the News of the World; the Times and the Sunday Times.
These he used to manipulate politicians up to and including the prime minister. The papers would also intimidate and bully his enemies. The Times and the Sunday Times were more nuanced and subtle in tone than the brash populist tabloids (or redtops, as we also call them). But they shared a unified line on Murdoch's pet political issues. His most persistent bugbear was the European Union and its single currency, even though the opinion of a US citizen whose companies pay virtually no taxes in Britain thanks to elaborate tax avoidance schemes should have carried little or no weight.
The Murdoch papers' key purpose, especially that of the daily, the Sun, was to determine the outcome of Britain's parliamentary elections. Whether they truly did so is debatable. But the perception was immortalized with the paper's headline the day after Labour's election defeat in 1992, "It Was The Sun Wot Won It."
Since then Conservative and Labour politicians (including Tony Blair and Gordon Brown) have gone out of their way to cultivate Murdoch and win the support of his papers. When Murdoch was in town or Rebekah Brooks on the phone, prime ministers jumped to attention--their spines permanently fixed in craven stoop. The papers were less successful in making money than in spreading fear and intimidation...

Continue reading

Misha Glenny @'CBS'

How phone hacking scandal took the shine off the Prime Minister

Google Plus Deleting Accounts En Masse: No Clear Answers

Google Deletes Last 7 Years Of User's Digital Life, Shrugs

Fjordman Speaks Out

The Hip-Hop Rhythm of Arab Revolt

'Never Mind The Buzzcocks' with Amy Winehouse

exiledsurfer exiledsurfer

http://bit.ly/ojWpTm #fuckyouwashington for $114.5 #TRILLION in unpayable debt

Christian Jihad? Why We Should Worry About Right-Wing Terror Attacks Like Norway's in the US

Richard Nixon's 'war on drugs' began 40 years ago, and the battle is still raging

In 1971, President Richard Nixon, motivated by addiction among US soldiers in Vietnam, told Congress drug abuse was ‘public enemy number one’ Photograph: AP
Four decades ago, on 17 July 1971, President Richard Nixon declared what has come to be called the "war on drugs". Nixon told Congress that drug addiction had "assumed the dimensions of a national emergency", and asked Capitol Hill for an initial $84m (£52m) for "emergency measures".
Drug abuse, said the president, was "public enemy number one".
But as reported the following morning in our sister newspaper, the Guardian, the president's initiative appears to have been primarily motivated not by considerations of the ghettoes or Woodstock festival, but by addiction among soldiers fighting in Vietnam: the first and immediate measure in the "war on drugs", implemented 40 years ago this weekend, was the institution of urine testing for all US troops in Indochina. The Guardian's "sidebar" story to the news bulletin was not from Chicago or Los Angeles but the Mekong Delta, with soldiers laughing: "You can go anywhere, ask anyone, they'll get it for you. It won't take but a few seconds."
Nixon signed his war on drugs into law on 28 January 1972, Adam Raphael quoting him in this newspaper as saying: "I am convinced that the only way to fight this menace is by attacking it on many fronts." The catchphrase "war on drugs" mimicked that of Nixon's predecessor Lyndon B Johnson, who had declared a "war on poverty" during his state of the union address in 1964.
Four decades on, in a world (and an America) accursed by poverty and drugs, there is almost universal agreement that the war on drugs has failed as thoroughly as that on poverty. In the US and Europe, the war has been fought on the streets, in the courts and through the jail system, to no apparent avail. In the world that has "developed" since 1971, it has been fought in the barrios; it has defoliated land and driven peasants into even worse poverty. The war in the so-called "producing" countries has ravaged Colombia, is currently tearing Mexico apart, and again threatens Afghanistan, Central America, Bolivia, Peru and Venezuela. In places such as west Africa, the war is creating "narco states" that have become effective puppets of the mafia cartels the war has spawned.
The drugs themselves have wrought misery and havoc across the planet, and continue to do so. According to the United Nations, in an exhaustive report by a global commission on drugs published this summer, worldwide opiate consumption increased by 34.5% between in the two decades to 2009, and that of cocaine by 25%. The UN estimates the drug business to be the third biggest in the world after oil and arms, worth £198bn a year. The former head of its office on drugs and crime, Antonio Maria Costa, posits that the laundered profits of the narco-trafficking underworld by the "legitimate" financial sector is what kept the banks afloat for years before they finally crashed in 2008...