Monday, 19 July 2010

Break Down Colors with 'Pictaculous'

Like the colors in an image you just saw but have no idea what they are? Here's an app that can you give the answers.



A web app by the people behind MailChimp, 'Pictaculous' helps you identify the colors used in an image that you've uploaded.
Simply upload an image on the site and 'Pictaculous' will break down your image into a primary color palette, in addition to a selection of up to 10 different palettes suggested by Kuler and COLORlovers.
Apparently, the web app also works on mobile phones. All you have to do is email your image to 'Pictaculous' and the results will be sent to you within minutes.

Moonshine 'tempts new generation'

Moonshine barrels line a road in 1925  
Prohibition prompted a surge in illegal moonshine production across the US in the 1920s and early 1930s
A growing number of Americans are thought to be getting involved in moonshining - distilling illegal liquor. Traditionally hidden in the backwoods, stills are now going into production in cities across the nation, as Claire Prentice reports from New York.
Against the backdrop of the recession and the current craze for artisan produce, illegal distilling clubs and "kitchen-sink" operations are popping up all over the US, from California to New York and Pennsylvania.
Making and selling moonshine is outlawed in every US state and the police treat distilling liquor without a license as a serious crime.
But while official figures are hard to come by, experts believe as many as a million Americans could be breaking the law by making moonshine - also known as white lightning and white dog.
"There's been a huge increase in the number of people making moonshine," says Max Watman, whose book, Chasing the White Dog, chronicles moonshine's colourful history.
He says that in recent years, the image of moonshine "has changed dramatically".
"The stigma has gone. It's become cool."
Moonshine has occupied a place in America's folk memory since Prohibition - the period between 1920 and 1933 when the production, sale and transporting of alcohol for consumption were banned across the US.
The term moonshine usually refers to whisky but it's a catch-all term for any spirit that is untaxed and illegally distilled.
'High-end mixologists'
Getting a distilling license can run into the tens of thousands of dollars.
But anyone found guilty of making spirits without a license faces a fine of up to $15,000 (£9,750) and up to five years' imprisonment.
Today's moonshiners are a diverse bunch. They include home distillers, high-end "mixologists", small businesses making cheap liquor to sell locally and bigger operations which sell across state lines.
Though most prosecutions continue to be in the south, many of today's new moonshiners are hipster kids, foodie enthusiasts and hobbyists on America's coasts, making booze in their kitchens and bathrooms.
One Brooklyn resident, who spoke on condition of anonymity, makes moonshine to her father's recipe.
She says: "Growing up, me and my brothers watched our dad make moonshine in the bathtub. Now we do it."
In her 20s and an aspiring musician, she is typical of the new breed of moonshiners. Rigged up in her kitchen is a gleaming copper still which she bought over the internet for several hundred dollars.
By day she works in a museum where many of her colleagues know about her illicit hobby.
"You've got to be careful about who you tell. I wouldn't go blabbing about it to someone I'd just met," she says.
'Relentless pursuit'
Private individuals distilling small amounts at home for their own consumption are unlikely to get caught, although police say they take all tip-offs seriously.
"If someone is producing illegally distilled spirits and not paying tax then we'll go after them," says Arthur Resnick, spokesman for the Federal Government's Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau.
A number of distillers have set up websites and blogs where they anonymously answer questions and give advice to first-timers or anyone having problems.
Colonel Vaughn Wilson is one of America's best known builders of copper stills. He has seen demand double for his stills in recent years.
"I can't keep up with my orders," say Col Wilson, who lives in Arkansas and whose stills range from $300 to $11,000 in price. "I've shipped stills to every state in the US."
Because prosecutions tend to be made on a state rather than federal basis, there is no record of the number of moonshine convictions made in America annually. But arrests have been made in Kentucky, Georgia and Arkansas in the past month.
A man in Bell County, Kentucky, was arrested in June after police discovered 100 gallons of moonshine (378 litres) and 500 gallons of mash on his property.
Police said it was part of an ongoing investigation and added that they hoped to make more arrests.
"It will be a relentless pursuit until the end," said Doug Jordan, of the Bell County Sheriff's Department.
A number of states have set up special moonshine task forces to combat the problem.
Arrests are usually made following tip-offs from neighbours or from local stores who report sales of unusually large quantities of sugar, a key ingredient, to the police.
Nathan Jones, of the Kentucky Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, says: "We get cases every month or so. The ones that come to our attention are the big ones."
Lure of illegality
Though cases of moonshine causing blindness are mostly a thing of the past, health officials warn of the dangers of drinking contaminated spirits.
"You do hear stories of people blowing themselves up but if you've read the basics and are using good quality products then it's hard to poison yourself," says Mr Watman.
The biggest moonshine bust in the United States occurred not during Prohibition but in 2001.
Dubbed "Operation Lightning Strike", it resulted in the arrest of 26 people in an operation that stretched from North Carolina to Philadelphia.
The group had dodged $20m in taxes on 1.5 million gallons of alcohol.
For many of today's moonshiners, the appeal lies in the pastime's illegality.
Col Wilson's website includes a section entitled "Beat the law".
He says: "The authorities will never stop moonshine. They are wasting their time trying."  

Sea Level Rise Swamps Islands 

Listen to this podcast:

The Disappearing Intellectual in the Age of Economic Darwinism

We live at a time that might be appropriately called the age of the disappearing intellectual, a disappearance that marks with disgrace a particularly dangerous period in American history. While there are plenty of talking heads spewing lies, insults and nonsense in the various media, it would be wrong to suggest that these right-wing populist are intellectuals. They are neither knowledgeable nor self-reflective, but largely ideological hacks catering to the worst impulses in American society. Some obvious examples would include John Stossel calling for the repeal of that "section of the 1964 Civil Rights Act that bans discrimination in public places."[1] And, of course, there are the more famous corporate-owned talking heads such as Glenn Beck, Charles Krauthammer, Bill O'Reilly and Rush Limbaugh, all of whom trade in reactionary world views, ignorance, ideological travesties and outlandish misrepresentations - all the while wrapping themselves in the populist creed of speaking for everyday Americans.
In a media scape and public sphere that view criticism, dialog and thoughtfulness as a liability, such anti-intellectuals abound, providing commentaries that are nativist, racist, reactionary and morally repugnant. But the premium put on ignorance and the disdain for critical intellectuals is not monopolized by the dominant media, it appears to have become one of the few criteria left for largely wealthy individuals to qualify for public office. One typical example is Minnesota Congresswoman Michele Bachmann, who throws out inanities such as labeling the Obama administration a "gangster government."[2] Bachmann refuses to take critical questions from the press because she claims that they unfairly focus on her language. She has a point. After all, it might be difficult to support statements such as the claim that "the US government used the census information to round up the Japanese [Americans] and put them in concentration camps."[3] Another typical example can be found in Congressman Joe Barton's apology to BP for having to pay for damages to the government stemming from its disastrous oil spill.
This "upscaling of ignorance"[4] gets worse. Richard Cohen, writing in The Washington Post about Sen. Michael Bennett, was shocked to discover that he was actually well-educated and smart but had to hide his qualifications in his primary campaign so as to not undermine his chance of being re-elected. Cohen concludes that in politics, "We have come to value ignorance."[5] He further argues that the notion that a politician should actually know something about domestic and foreign affairs is now considered a liability. He writes:
[W]e now have politicians who lack a child's knowledge of government. In Nevada, Sharron Angle has won the GOP Senate nomination espousing phasing out Social Security and repealing the income tax as well as abolishing that durable conservative target, the Education Department. Similarly, in Connecticut, Linda McMahon, a former pro wrestling tycoon, is running commercials so adamantly anti-Washington you would think she's an anarchist. In Arizona Andy Goss, a Republican congressional candidate, suggests requiring all members of Congress to live in a barracks. This might be tough on wives, children and the odd cocker spaniel, but what the hell. Nowadays, all ideas are equal.[6]
Continue reading 
Henry A Giroux @'Truth-out'

Sorry to upload 2 posts from Truth-out.org , but find this post absolutely addresses the "Cult of Ignorance" that is daily, unremittingly propagated by the mass media (as controlled by the mega rich) to the general public at large, allowing the again daily devastation, exploitation and inhumanity that passes for modern society, to go unnoticed. The manipulation of the education system to deny democratic principles in the name of Big Business...Please read...

New Documents, Employees Reveal BP's Alaska Oilfield Plagued by Major Safety Issues

Nearly 5,000 miles from the oil-spill catastrophe in the Gulf of Mexico, BP and its culture of cost-cutting are contributing to another environmental mess in the Prudhoe Bay oil field on Alaska’s north shore, according to internal BP documents and more than a dozen employees interviewed over the past month.
After a serious oil spill last November and other mishaps, the BP employees fingered a long list of safety issues that have not been adequately addressed, making the Prudhoe Bay oilfield vulnerable to a devastating accident that potentially could rival the havoc in the Gulf.
"The condition of the [Prudhoe Bay] field is a lot worse and in my opinion a lot more dangerous," said Marc Kovac, who has worked for BP on Alaska's North Slope for more than three decades. "We still have hundreds of miles of rotting pipe ready to break that needs to be replaced. We are totally unprepared for a large spill."
Kovac, a mechanic and welder who is the steward of the United Steelworkers union local 4959, said a lot of employees share his feelings, but "don't want to risk their jobs for speaking out." Kovac said he was willing to take the risk because BP has been slow to deal with the Prudhoe Bay problems and that "many lives are at stake."
Some of the employees, speaking anonymously, said BP follows an "operate to failure" attitude.
Kovac said that means BP Alaska avoids spending money on "upkeep" and instead runs the equipment until it breaks down...
Continue reading
Jason Leopold @'Truth-out'

Sunday, 18 July 2010

Child prison secret restraint tactics 'revealed'

Bioluminescence in the Gippsland Lakes

Parkour from 1930

Israel Stops Listening to Its Judges

The Israeli government is facing legal action for contempt over its refusal to implement a Supreme Court ruling that it end a policy of awarding preferential budgets to Jewish communities, including settlements, rather than much poorer Palestinian Arab towns and villages inside Israel.
The contempt case on behalf of Israel’s Palestinian minority comes in the wake of growing criticism of the government for ignoring court decisions it does not like -- a trend that has been noted by the Supreme Court justices themselves.
Yehudit Karp, a former deputy attorney general, compiled a list of 12 recent court rulings the government has refused to implement, but legal groups believe there are more examples. Many of the disregarded judgements confer benefits on Palestinians, either in the occupied territories or inside Israel, or penalise the settlers.
Critics have accused the government of violating the rule of law and warned that the defiance has been possible chiefly because right-wing politicians and religious groups have severely eroded the Supreme Court’s authority over the past few years.
Senior members of the current right-wing government of prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, including the justice minister, Yaakov Neeman, have repeatedly criticized the court for what they call its “judicial activism”, or interference in matters they believe should be decided by the parliament alone.
Legal experts, however, warn that, because Israel lacks a constitution, the court is the only bulwark against a tyrannical Jewish majority abusing the rights of the country’s 1.3 million Palestinian citizens, as well as 4 million Palestinians living under occupation in the West Bank and Gaza.
Ilan Saban, a law professor at Haifa University, said: “Unlike most -- if not all -- other democracies, Israel lacks a political culture that respects limits on the power of the majority.”
Even the protections offered by Israel’s basic laws, he said, were not deeply entrenched and could easily be re-legislated. The lack of both a formal constitution and a tradition of political tolerance, he added, was “a dangerous cocktail”.
Israel’s liberal Haaretz newspaper went further, warning recently that, in “slandering the judiciary”, government officials had provoked a crisis that could “lead to the destruction of Israeli democracy”.
The country’s highest court is due to rule in the coming weeks on whether the government is in contempt of a ruling the court made four years ago to end a discriminatory scheme, known as National Priority Areas (NPA), that provides extra education funding to eligible communities.
The High Follow-Up Committee, an umbrella political body representing Israel’s large Palestinian minority, launched the case because only four small Palestinian villages were classified in NPAs, against some 550 Jewish communities. The scheme, introduced in 1998, is believed to have deprived Palestinian citizens, a fifth of Israel’s population, of millions of dollars.
Although the court ruled in February 2006 that the scheme must be scrapped, the government has issued a series of extensions until at least 2012.
Sawsan Zaher, a lawyer with Adalah, a legal centre that launched the contempt petition, said: “This case has become a symbol of how the government refuses to implement decisions it does not like, especially ones relating to constitutional protection and minority rights.”
However, she said that punishing the state for its actions would not be easy. “After all, the court is not going to jail the government. The best we can hope for is a fine.”
The NPA case is only one of several that have highlighted a growing trend of law-breaking by the government...
Continue reading
Jonathan Cook @'Counterpunch'

Saturday, 17 July 2010

Germany rejects 'transfer bid' for octopus oracle Paul

Bendle - Folding In

<a href="http://bendle.bandcamp.com/track/folding-in">folding in by bendle</a>

Giving up my iPod for a Walkman

Japanese Binocular Soccer

Took the words right out of my mouth...

Little Axe: from blues to hip-hop and back

Little Axe
 
New blues ... Little Axe. Photograph: York Tillyer
Skip McDonald was playing a gig in Portugal, billed as just him and guitar. A fair portion of the audience had seen the billing and decided an evening of traditional blues was just what they wanted. They might have wanted traditional blues, but they didn't get it. On entering the venue, they came across a stage upon which stood not a stool, a microphone and a guitar, but a selection of samplers and computers, as well as the setup for a full rock band."The purists were outraged," says McDonald. "About 20 of them started walking out. The rest of them stayed and we got on fine. It was a particularly good gig."
He can laugh about it now, because 17 years after starting his Little Axe project, in which the old Delta blues is reinterpreted with the aid of technology, what was a revolutionary approach to an old music has become the norm. Beck and Moby took McDonald's ideas and placed them in the mainstream. McDonald, who's flattered by his imitators, would be happy with their kind of sales, but more important to him is his mission to redefine what constitutes the blues.
"I don't like the way music is put in little boxes with a label on it," McDonald says. "I hear the blues in a lot of different types of music that no one would ever call the blues. And I don't think the blues has to be about pain. You might have a lyric about going across town where there's a woman who's nice to you. The blues can be joyous. There are two types of music: deep and shallow. For me, the blues is anything that starts with an emotion."
McDonald was born Bernard Alexander in Dayton, Ohio in September 1949. He was taught to play blues guitar when he was eight by his father, a steel worker who played at weekends. McDonald's father drilled home the importance of having a steady job, but the son wanted to chance his arm making it in music. He left home at 17, playing jazz, funk and disco up and down the east coast before he met bassist Doug Wimbish and then, in 1979, drummer Keith LeBlanc. As the house band of Sugarhill records, the trio played on some of the early hits of hip-hop – The Message, by Grandmaster Flash and the Furious Five; White Lines by Grandmaster Melle Mel. Rap's modern take on the blues hit him "like a left hook from nowhere. Those early gigs in Harlem were just completely crazy."
McDonald went from Sugarhill to recording with Afrikaa Bambaataa and James Brown ("a serious man. I learned to call him Mr Brown"), with Sinéad O'Connor and – in another association with a label – the On-U Sound imprint of the English producer Adrian Sherwood, where the McDonald-Wimbish-LeBlanc trio formed the core of Tackhead, the avant-garde funk band that often served as On-U Sound's house band in the 80s.
McDonald first recorded as Little Axe in 1994, and his latest album, Bought for a Dollar, Sold For a Dime, takes McDonald full circle by reuniting the Sugarhill trio for the first time in 17 years. "To be true to yourself sometimes you have to go back to the beginning," he says, echoing the album's lyric about how a man must return to the crossroads to find himself. "I have a chemistry – a telepathy – with those people." But Little Axe remain a broader church. At one gig, the band were joined on stage by superfan Robert Plant.
"He's known for heavy metal, but I hear a blues singer," McDonald says. "I get into trouble for saying this but when I hear Led Zeppelin or the Rolling Stones they're immersed in blues. It's an endless journey for us all. I feel like I'm just getting started."
Dave Simpson @'The Guardian'
(Thanx Owen!)