TWO HOURS OF…..NEW ORDER
59 minutes ago
Thursday, 5 March 2009
Wednesday, 4 March 2009
The Holy Grail is mine!!!
Been searching for this (vinyl) for years.I once saw the CD in a shop but didn't have a CD player at the time. However as it was withdrawn by the band themselves I learnt my lesson and started buying CD's before I had a player.
Hell as a kid I was buying records before I had a record player!
Anyway a copy of this just went on sale and I bought it (allegedly one of only 500 copies made)!
Feel as tho' I have just won a competition for the first time in my life!!!
Anyway a copy of this just went on sale and I bought it (allegedly one of only 500 copies made)!
Feel as tho' I have just won a competition for the first time in my life!!!
Kenny Dalgleish breaks his 20 year silence on the Hillsborough tragedy
(I once found a couple of kittens whose mother had been run over. They could only have been a couple of days old and it was worse than kids! Had to feed them with an eyedropper and they didn't know anything tho' I drew the line at showing them how to use the litter tray! Called them Kenny & Dalgleish. Turned out to be girls (hard to tell what sex kittens are!) So Ms. Kenny & Ms. Dalgleish it was. Many years later my eldest son asked me if I knew there was a famous footballer that had our cats name!
Bonus:
The Barmy Army - 'Sharp As A Needle'
Tuesday, 3 March 2009
Make Bono History (Put the NO back into Bono!)
Slip-slop-slap-slap-slap!"The issue as far as we are concerned is one of hypocrisy, and that hypocrisy relates to several matters. Firstly, we do not think that anyone can ask a government on moral grounds to extend its resources on any issue and then deny that they have a moral obligation to pay their taxes in the place where they really reside. U2 do not reside in the Netherlands. They moved their tax affairs there solely because the Irish government introduced taxation on their royalty income and they prefer to pay a very low rate of tax ( probably 5%) in the Netherlands rather than pay still ludicrously low rate of tax of 12.5% in Ireland on that same income. This was pure avoidance behaviour, artificially, in our opinion, relocating an income stream from one country to another to obtain a tax advantage. I stress, this may be legal, but you cannot in our opinion argue that there is a moral dimension to the use of taxation revenues when you do not think that there is a moral dimension to the payment of tax. That is one of the issues that we are focusing upon here. Second, we are focusing upon the use of tax havens by Bono. It is now widely agreed that tax havens do harm. They undermine the rights of democratic governments to fulfil the mandate they have been given by the electorate by denying them the resources that are rightfully theirs. We think that any successful development agenda has to be pro-democracy and the use of a tax haven such as the Netherlands ( and in this context the Netherlands is very definitely a tax haven) indicates a lack of understanding of this issue. Next, tax havens are used for illicit financial flows out of developing countries. The Global Financial Integrity Project in Washington DC has recently shown that at least $800 billion a year flows out of developing countries to develop states, all of it illicitly. Most of that flow through tax havens. Some of it will undoubtedly flow through Netherlands structures which are identical to those used by U2. You cannot tackle illicit capital flight from developing countries and then use identical structures for your own taxation purposes. These structures have to be abolished for both purposes, you cannot deliver one and not the other. Finally, Bono has, despite our very best efforts, refused to accept that tax is part of the development agenda, no doubt for his own personal reasons. I have met with his personal development agency - DATA - and they are not recognising this essential fourth stage in the development agenda. We have moved from a trade to debt and now we are moving to tax. Many of the agencies were (sic) backed this campaign against Bono including Oxfam and Christian aid have done so precisely because they recognise that a post aid world is essential - our goal should be to create countries able to stand on their own two feet, with democratic governments, held accountable by the electorate precisely because that electorate pay tax to them, and because those governments have it within their power to tax the multinational corporations who are based within them. This is what we hope for - countries that can provide for their own people and their educational, health care and other needs. Without tax that is not possible. But have we heard Bono saying this? No, we haven’t - not once. And we think that indicates that he is completely out of step with the development agenda that now exists. His supposed philanthropy is of another era - and it will not work. Our campaign is not, therefore, a simple personal attack. Far from it. It is ideologically based. It is based upon critical analysis. It is based upon the clear evidence that the form of tax planning that Bono is using is harmful. And it is based upon his failure to engage with those of us who are taking this agenda forward. I am proud to be associated with those who organised this stunt.
I would be happy to meet Bono anywhere to discuss the issues that we raise – but in front of an audience. This man has to be held to account for what he does.
Will he accept?"
I like the idea of downloading their album & giving the money to charity.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
